On Rank Aggregating Test Prioritizations

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mondal, Shouvick, Chen, Tse-Hsun
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909410066956288
author Mondal, Shouvick
Chen, Tse-Hsun
author_facet Mondal, Shouvick
Chen, Tse-Hsun
contents Test case prioritization (TCP) has been an effective strategy to optimize regression testing. Traditionally, test cases are ordered based on some heuristic and rerun against the version under test with the goal of yielding a high failure throughput. Almost four decades of TCP research has seen extensive contributions in the light of individual prioritization strategies. However, test case prioritization via preference aggregation has largely been unexplored. We envision this methodology as an opportunity to obtain robust prioritizations by consolidating multiple standalone ranked lists, i.e., performing a consensus. In this work, we propose Ensemble Test Prioritization (EnTP) as a three stage pipeline involving: (i) ensemble selection, (ii) rank aggregation, and (iii) test case execution. We evaluate EnTP on 20 open-source C projects from the Software-artifact Infrastructure Repository and GitHub (totaling: 694,512 SLOC, 280 versions, and 69,305 system level test-cases). We employ an ensemble of 16 standalone prioritization plans, four of which are imposed due to respective state-of-the-art approaches. We build EnTP on the foundations of Hansie, an existing framework on consensus prioritization and show that EnTP's diversity based ensemble selection budget of top-75% followed by rank aggregation can outperform Hansie, and the employed standalone prioritization approaches.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_00015
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On Rank Aggregating Test Prioritizations
Mondal, Shouvick
Chen, Tse-Hsun
Software Engineering
Test case prioritization (TCP) has been an effective strategy to optimize regression testing. Traditionally, test cases are ordered based on some heuristic and rerun against the version under test with the goal of yielding a high failure throughput. Almost four decades of TCP research has seen extensive contributions in the light of individual prioritization strategies. However, test case prioritization via preference aggregation has largely been unexplored. We envision this methodology as an opportunity to obtain robust prioritizations by consolidating multiple standalone ranked lists, i.e., performing a consensus. In this work, we propose Ensemble Test Prioritization (EnTP) as a three stage pipeline involving: (i) ensemble selection, (ii) rank aggregation, and (iii) test case execution. We evaluate EnTP on 20 open-source C projects from the Software-artifact Infrastructure Repository and GitHub (totaling: 694,512 SLOC, 280 versions, and 69,305 system level test-cases). We employ an ensemble of 16 standalone prioritization plans, four of which are imposed due to respective state-of-the-art approaches. We build EnTP on the foundations of Hansie, an existing framework on consensus prioritization and show that EnTP's diversity based ensemble selection budget of top-75% followed by rank aggregation can outperform Hansie, and the employed standalone prioritization approaches.
title On Rank Aggregating Test Prioritizations
topic Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00015