Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00260 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866913591988322304 |
|---|---|
| author | Lim, Gordon Larson, Stefan Huang, Yu Leach, Kevin |
| author_facet | Lim, Gordon Larson, Stefan Huang, Yu Leach, Kevin |
| contents | Crowdsourcing is a common approach to rapidly annotate large volumes of data in machine learning applications. Typically, crowd workers are compensated with a flat rate based on an estimated completion time to meet a target hourly wage. Unfortunately, prior work has shown that variability in completion times among crowd workers led to overpayment by 168% in one case, and underpayment by 16% in another. However, by setting a time limit for task completion, it is possible to manage the risk of overpaying or underpaying while still facilitating flat rate payments. In this paper, we present an analysis of the impact of a time limit on crowd worker performance and satisfaction. We conducted a human study with a maximum view time for a crowdsourced image classification task. We find that the impact on overall crowd worker performance diminishes as view time increases. Despite some images being challenging under time limits, a consensus algorithm remains effective at preserving data quality and filters images needing more time. Additionally, crowd workers' consistent performance throughout the time-limited task indicates sustained effort, and their psychometric questionnaire scores show they prefer shorter limits. Based on our findings, we recommend implementing task time limits as a practical approach to making compensation more equitable and predictable. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_00260 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Towards Fair Pay and Equal Work: Imposing View Time Limits in Crowdsourced Image Classification Lim, Gordon Larson, Stefan Huang, Yu Leach, Kevin Human-Computer Interaction Crowdsourcing is a common approach to rapidly annotate large volumes of data in machine learning applications. Typically, crowd workers are compensated with a flat rate based on an estimated completion time to meet a target hourly wage. Unfortunately, prior work has shown that variability in completion times among crowd workers led to overpayment by 168% in one case, and underpayment by 16% in another. However, by setting a time limit for task completion, it is possible to manage the risk of overpaying or underpaying while still facilitating flat rate payments. In this paper, we present an analysis of the impact of a time limit on crowd worker performance and satisfaction. We conducted a human study with a maximum view time for a crowdsourced image classification task. We find that the impact on overall crowd worker performance diminishes as view time increases. Despite some images being challenging under time limits, a consensus algorithm remains effective at preserving data quality and filters images needing more time. Additionally, crowd workers' consistent performance throughout the time-limited task indicates sustained effort, and their psychometric questionnaire scores show they prefer shorter limits. Based on our findings, we recommend implementing task time limits as a practical approach to making compensation more equitable and predictable. |
| title | Towards Fair Pay and Equal Work: Imposing View Time Limits in Crowdsourced Image Classification |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00260 |