A Feedback Toolkit and Procedural Guidance for Teaching Thorough Testing
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866929609445998592 |
|---|---|
| author | Dick, Steffen Bockisch, Christoph Passier, Harrie Bijlsma, Lex Kuiper, Ruurd |
| author_facet | Dick, Steffen Bockisch, Christoph Passier, Harrie Bijlsma, Lex Kuiper, Ruurd |
| contents | Correctness is one of the more important criteria of qualitative software. However, it is often taught in isolation and most students consider it only as an afterthought. They also do not receive sufficient feedback on code quality and tests unless specified in the assignment. To improve this, we developed a procedural guidance that guides students to an implementation with appropriate tests. Furthermore, we have developed a toolkit that students can use to independently get individual feedback on their solution and the adequateness of their tests. A key instrument is a test coverage analysis which allows for teachers to customize the feedback with constructive instructions specific to the current assignment to improve a student's test suite. In this paper, we outline the procedural guidance, explain the working of the feedback toolkit and present a method for using the toolkit in conjunction with the different steps of the procedural guidance. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_00417 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Feedback Toolkit and Procedural Guidance for Teaching Thorough Testing Dick, Steffen Bockisch, Christoph Passier, Harrie Bijlsma, Lex Kuiper, Ruurd Software Engineering Human-Computer Interaction Correctness is one of the more important criteria of qualitative software. However, it is often taught in isolation and most students consider it only as an afterthought. They also do not receive sufficient feedback on code quality and tests unless specified in the assignment. To improve this, we developed a procedural guidance that guides students to an implementation with appropriate tests. Furthermore, we have developed a toolkit that students can use to independently get individual feedback on their solution and the adequateness of their tests. A key instrument is a test coverage analysis which allows for teachers to customize the feedback with constructive instructions specific to the current assignment to improve a student's test suite. In this paper, we outline the procedural guidance, explain the working of the feedback toolkit and present a method for using the toolkit in conjunction with the different steps of the procedural guidance. |
| title | A Feedback Toolkit and Procedural Guidance for Teaching Thorough Testing |
| topic | Software Engineering Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00417 |