Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dey, Neil, Martin, Ryan, Williams, Jonathan P.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929610168467456
author Dey, Neil
Martin, Ryan
Williams, Jonathan P.
author_facet Dey, Neil
Martin, Ryan
Williams, Jonathan P.
contents Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. If the goal is to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously, one can construct e-values for each individual test and then use the recently developed e-BH procedure to properly correct for multiplicity. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This paper demonstrates that the generalized universal inference framework can be used along with the e-BH procedure to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the validity and power of this approach via a simulation study, testing the significance of a predictor in quantile regression.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_01008
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Multiple Testing in Generalized Universal Inference
Dey, Neil
Martin, Ryan
Williams, Jonathan P.
Methodology
Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. If the goal is to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously, one can construct e-values for each individual test and then use the recently developed e-BH procedure to properly correct for multiplicity. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This paper demonstrates that the generalized universal inference framework can be used along with the e-BH procedure to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the validity and power of this approach via a simulation study, testing the significance of a predictor in quantile regression.
title Multiple Testing in Generalized Universal Inference
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01008