Quantifying Core Stability Relaxations in Hedonic Games

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Demeulemeester, Tom, Peters, Jannik
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866917862541623296
author Demeulemeester, Tom
Peters, Jannik
author_facet Demeulemeester, Tom
Peters, Jannik
contents We study relationships between different relaxed notions of core stability in hedonic games, which are a class of coalition formation games. Our unified approach applies to a newly introduced family of hedonic games, called $α$-hedonic games, which contains previously studied variants such as fractional and additively separable hedonic games. In particular, we derive an upper bound on the maximum factor with which a blocking coalition of a certain size can improve upon an outcome in which no deviating coalition of size at most $q$ exists. Counterintuitively, we show that larger blocking coalitions might sometimes have lower improvement factors. We discuss the tightness conditions of our bound, as well as its implications on the price of anarchy of core relaxations. Our general result has direct implications for several well-studied classes of hedonic games, allowing us to prove two open conjectures by Fanelli et al. (2021) for fractional hedonic games.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_01666
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Quantifying Core Stability Relaxations in Hedonic Games
Demeulemeester, Tom
Peters, Jannik
Computer Science and Game Theory
Discrete Mathematics
Combinatorics
We study relationships between different relaxed notions of core stability in hedonic games, which are a class of coalition formation games. Our unified approach applies to a newly introduced family of hedonic games, called $α$-hedonic games, which contains previously studied variants such as fractional and additively separable hedonic games. In particular, we derive an upper bound on the maximum factor with which a blocking coalition of a certain size can improve upon an outcome in which no deviating coalition of size at most $q$ exists. Counterintuitively, we show that larger blocking coalitions might sometimes have lower improvement factors. We discuss the tightness conditions of our bound, as well as its implications on the price of anarchy of core relaxations. Our general result has direct implications for several well-studied classes of hedonic games, allowing us to prove two open conjectures by Fanelli et al. (2021) for fractional hedonic games.
title Quantifying Core Stability Relaxations in Hedonic Games
topic Computer Science and Game Theory
Discrete Mathematics
Combinatorics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01666