Optimizing Returns from Experimentation Programs

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sudijono, Timothy, Ejdemyr, Simon, Lal, Apoorva, Tingley, Martin
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929619684294656
author Sudijono, Timothy
Ejdemyr, Simon
Lal, Apoorva
Tingley, Martin
author_facet Sudijono, Timothy
Ejdemyr, Simon
Lal, Apoorva
Tingley, Martin
contents Experimentation in online digital platforms is used to inform decision making. Specifically, the goal of many experiments is to optimize a metric of interest. Null hypothesis statistical testing can be ill-suited to this task, as it is indifferent to the magnitude of effect sizes and opportunity costs. Given access to a pool of related past experiments, we discuss how experimentation practice should change when the goal is optimization. We survey the literature on empirical Bayes analyses of A/B test portfolios, and single out the A/B Testing Problem (Azevedo et al., 2020) as a starting point, which treats experimentation as a constrained optimization problem. We show that the framework can be solved with dynamic programming and implemented by appropriately tuning $p$-value thresholds. Furthermore, we develop several extensions of the A/B Testing Problem and discuss the implications of these results on experimentation programs in industry. For example, under no-cost assumptions, firms should be testing many more ideas, reducing test allocation sizes, and relaxing $p$-value thresholds away from $p = 0.05$.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_05508
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Optimizing Returns from Experimentation Programs
Sudijono, Timothy
Ejdemyr, Simon
Lal, Apoorva
Tingley, Martin
Methodology
Econometrics
Applications
Experimentation in online digital platforms is used to inform decision making. Specifically, the goal of many experiments is to optimize a metric of interest. Null hypothesis statistical testing can be ill-suited to this task, as it is indifferent to the magnitude of effect sizes and opportunity costs. Given access to a pool of related past experiments, we discuss how experimentation practice should change when the goal is optimization. We survey the literature on empirical Bayes analyses of A/B test portfolios, and single out the A/B Testing Problem (Azevedo et al., 2020) as a starting point, which treats experimentation as a constrained optimization problem. We show that the framework can be solved with dynamic programming and implemented by appropriately tuning $p$-value thresholds. Furthermore, we develop several extensions of the A/B Testing Problem and discuss the implications of these results on experimentation programs in industry. For example, under no-cost assumptions, firms should be testing many more ideas, reducing test allocation sizes, and relaxing $p$-value thresholds away from $p = 0.05$.
title Optimizing Returns from Experimentation Programs
topic Methodology
Econometrics
Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05508