Scope of physics-based simulation artefacts
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910734349238272 |
|---|---|
| author | Horsch, Martin Thomas Machot, Fadi Al Vrabec, Jadran |
| author_facet | Horsch, Martin Thomas Machot, Fadi Al Vrabec, Jadran |
| contents | Data and metadata documentation requirements for explainable-AI-ready (XAIR) models and data in physics-based simulation technology are discussed by analysing different perspectives from the literature on two core aspects: First, the scope of the simulation; this category is taken to include subject matter, the objective with which the simulation is conducted, and the object of reference, i.e., the simulated physical system or process. Second, the artefacts that need to be documented in order to make data and models XAIR, and modelling and simulation workflows explainable; two CEN workshop agreements, MODA and ModGra, are compared for this purpose. As a result, minimum requirements for an ontologization of the scope of simulation artefacts are formulated, and the object-objective abstractness diagram is proposed as a tool for visualizing the landscape of use cases for physics-based simulation. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_06077 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Scope of physics-based simulation artefacts Horsch, Martin Thomas Machot, Fadi Al Vrabec, Jadran Computational Physics Data and metadata documentation requirements for explainable-AI-ready (XAIR) models and data in physics-based simulation technology are discussed by analysing different perspectives from the literature on two core aspects: First, the scope of the simulation; this category is taken to include subject matter, the objective with which the simulation is conducted, and the object of reference, i.e., the simulated physical system or process. Second, the artefacts that need to be documented in order to make data and models XAIR, and modelling and simulation workflows explainable; two CEN workshop agreements, MODA and ModGra, are compared for this purpose. As a result, minimum requirements for an ontologization of the scope of simulation artefacts are formulated, and the object-objective abstractness diagram is proposed as a tool for visualizing the landscape of use cases for physics-based simulation. |
| title | Scope of physics-based simulation artefacts |
| topic | Computational Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06077 |