Optimizing Alignment with Less: Leveraging Data Augmentation for Personalized Evaluation

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Seraj, Javad, Mohajeri, Mohammad Mahdi, Dousti, Mohammad Javad, Ahmadabadi, Majid Nili
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866929622558441472
author Seraj, Javad
Mohajeri, Mohammad Mahdi
Dousti, Mohammad Javad
Ahmadabadi, Majid Nili
author_facet Seraj, Javad
Mohajeri, Mohammad Mahdi
Dousti, Mohammad Javad
Ahmadabadi, Majid Nili
contents Automatic evaluation by large language models (LLMs) is a prominent topic today; however, judgment and evaluation tasks are often subjective and influenced by various factors, making adaptation challenging. While many studies demonstrate the capabilities of state-of-the-art proprietary LLMs in comparison to human evaluators, they often struggle to adapt to reference evaluators over time, a requirement for achieving personalized judgment. Additionally, numerous works have attempted to apply open LLMs as judges or evaluators, but these efforts frequently overlook the limitations of working with scarce data. Personalized judgment is inherently associated with limited data scenarios, which are common in many real-world problems. Our work aims to present a data augmentation technique to select a more effective sample from limited data in order to align an open LLM with human preference. Our work achieves approximately 7% improvements in Pearson correlation with a reference judge over the baseline,and 30% improvement over the base model (Llama3.1-8B-Instruct) in the mathematical reasoning evaluation task. demonstrating that augmenting selecting more effective preference data enables our approach to surpass baseline methods.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_07429
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Optimizing Alignment with Less: Leveraging Data Augmentation for Personalized Evaluation
Seraj, Javad
Mohajeri, Mohammad Mahdi
Dousti, Mohammad Javad
Ahmadabadi, Majid Nili
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Automatic evaluation by large language models (LLMs) is a prominent topic today; however, judgment and evaluation tasks are often subjective and influenced by various factors, making adaptation challenging. While many studies demonstrate the capabilities of state-of-the-art proprietary LLMs in comparison to human evaluators, they often struggle to adapt to reference evaluators over time, a requirement for achieving personalized judgment. Additionally, numerous works have attempted to apply open LLMs as judges or evaluators, but these efforts frequently overlook the limitations of working with scarce data. Personalized judgment is inherently associated with limited data scenarios, which are common in many real-world problems. Our work aims to present a data augmentation technique to select a more effective sample from limited data in order to align an open LLM with human preference. Our work achieves approximately 7% improvements in Pearson correlation with a reference judge over the baseline,and 30% improvement over the base model (Llama3.1-8B-Instruct) in the mathematical reasoning evaluation task. demonstrating that augmenting selecting more effective preference data enables our approach to surpass baseline methods.
title Optimizing Alignment with Less: Leveraging Data Augmentation for Personalized Evaluation
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07429