Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei, Rongzhe, Li, Mufei, Ghassemi, Mohsen, Kreačić, Eleonora, Li, Yifan, Yue, Xiang, Li, Bo, Potluru, Vamsi K., Li, Pan, Chien, Eli
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08559
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909630820515840
author Wei, Rongzhe
Li, Mufei
Ghassemi, Mohsen
Kreačić, Eleonora
Li, Yifan
Yue, Xiang
Li, Bo
Potluru, Vamsi K.
Li, Pan
Chien, Eli
author_facet Wei, Rongzhe
Li, Mufei
Ghassemi, Mohsen
Kreačić, Eleonora
Li, Yifan
Yue, Xiang
Li, Bo
Potluru, Vamsi K.
Li, Pan
Chien, Eli
contents Large Language Models (LLMs) embed sensitive, human-generated data, prompting the need for unlearning methods. Although certified unlearning offers strong privacy guarantees, its restrictive assumptions make it unsuitable for LLMs, giving rise to various heuristic approaches typically assessed through empirical evaluations. These standard evaluations randomly select data for removal, apply unlearning techniques, and use membership inference attacks (MIAs) to compare unlearned models against models retrained without the removed data. However, to ensure robust privacy protections for every data point, it is essential to account for scenarios in which certain data subsets face elevated risks. Prior research suggests that outliers, particularly including data tied to minority groups, often exhibit higher memorization propensity which indicates they may be more difficult to unlearn. Building on these insights, we introduce a complementary, minority-aware evaluation framework to highlight blind spots in existing frameworks. We substantiate our findings with carefully designed experiments, using canaries with personally identifiable information (PII) to represent these minority subsets and demonstrate that they suffer at least 20% higher privacy leakage across various unlearning methods, MIAs, datasets, and LLM scales. Our proposed minority-aware evaluation framework marks an essential step toward more equitable and comprehensive assessments of LLM unlearning efficacy.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_08559
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Underestimated Privacy Risks for Minority Populations in Large Language Model Unlearning
Wei, Rongzhe
Li, Mufei
Ghassemi, Mohsen
Kreačić, Eleonora
Li, Yifan
Yue, Xiang
Li, Bo
Potluru, Vamsi K.
Li, Pan
Chien, Eli
Machine Learning
Large Language Models (LLMs) embed sensitive, human-generated data, prompting the need for unlearning methods. Although certified unlearning offers strong privacy guarantees, its restrictive assumptions make it unsuitable for LLMs, giving rise to various heuristic approaches typically assessed through empirical evaluations. These standard evaluations randomly select data for removal, apply unlearning techniques, and use membership inference attacks (MIAs) to compare unlearned models against models retrained without the removed data. However, to ensure robust privacy protections for every data point, it is essential to account for scenarios in which certain data subsets face elevated risks. Prior research suggests that outliers, particularly including data tied to minority groups, often exhibit higher memorization propensity which indicates they may be more difficult to unlearn. Building on these insights, we introduce a complementary, minority-aware evaluation framework to highlight blind spots in existing frameworks. We substantiate our findings with carefully designed experiments, using canaries with personally identifiable information (PII) to represent these minority subsets and demonstrate that they suffer at least 20% higher privacy leakage across various unlearning methods, MIAs, datasets, and LLM scales. Our proposed minority-aware evaluation framework marks an essential step toward more equitable and comprehensive assessments of LLM unlearning efficacy.
title Underestimated Privacy Risks for Minority Populations in Large Language Model Unlearning
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08559