Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10509 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866909428165378048 |
|---|---|
| author | Carro, Maria Victoria Selasco, Francisca Gauna Mester, Denise Alejandra Gonzales, Margarita Leiva, Mario A. Martinez, Maria Vanina Simari, Gerardo I. |
| author_facet | Carro, Maria Victoria Selasco, Francisca Gauna Mester, Denise Alejandra Gonzales, Margarita Leiva, Mario A. Martinez, Maria Vanina Simari, Gerardo I. |
| contents | Causal learning is the cognitive process of developing the capability of making causal inferences based on available information, often guided by normative principles. This process is prone to errors and biases, such as the illusion of causality, in which people perceive a causal relationship between two variables despite lacking supporting evidence. This cognitive bias has been proposed to underlie many societal problems, including social prejudice, stereotype formation, misinformation, and superstitious thinking. In this research, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) develop causal illusions, both in real-world and controlled laboratory contexts of causal learning and inference. To this end, we built a dataset of over 2K samples including purely correlational cases, situations with null contingency, and cases where temporal information excludes the possibility of causality by placing the potential effect before the cause. We then prompted the models to make statements or answer causal questions to evaluate their tendencies to infer causation erroneously in these structured settings. Our findings show a strong presence of causal illusion bias in LLMs. Specifically, in open-ended generation tasks involving spurious correlations, the models displayed bias at levels comparable to, or even lower than, those observed in similar studies on human subjects. However, when faced with null-contingency scenarios or temporal cues that negate causal relationships, where it was required to respond on a 0-100 scale, the models exhibited significantly higher bias. These findings suggest that the models have not uniformly, consistently, or reliably internalized the normative principles essential for accurate causal learning. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_10509 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do Large Language Models Show Biases in Causal Learning? Carro, Maria Victoria Selasco, Francisca Gauna Mester, Denise Alejandra Gonzales, Margarita Leiva, Mario A. Martinez, Maria Vanina Simari, Gerardo I. Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Machine Learning Causal learning is the cognitive process of developing the capability of making causal inferences based on available information, often guided by normative principles. This process is prone to errors and biases, such as the illusion of causality, in which people perceive a causal relationship between two variables despite lacking supporting evidence. This cognitive bias has been proposed to underlie many societal problems, including social prejudice, stereotype formation, misinformation, and superstitious thinking. In this research, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) develop causal illusions, both in real-world and controlled laboratory contexts of causal learning and inference. To this end, we built a dataset of over 2K samples including purely correlational cases, situations with null contingency, and cases where temporal information excludes the possibility of causality by placing the potential effect before the cause. We then prompted the models to make statements or answer causal questions to evaluate their tendencies to infer causation erroneously in these structured settings. Our findings show a strong presence of causal illusion bias in LLMs. Specifically, in open-ended generation tasks involving spurious correlations, the models displayed bias at levels comparable to, or even lower than, those observed in similar studies on human subjects. However, when faced with null-contingency scenarios or temporal cues that negate causal relationships, where it was required to respond on a 0-100 scale, the models exhibited significantly higher bias. These findings suggest that the models have not uniformly, consistently, or reliably internalized the normative principles essential for accurate causal learning. |
| title | Do Large Language Models Show Biases in Causal Learning? |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10509 |