Are the Latent Representations of Foundation Models for Pathology Invariant to Rotation?

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elphick, Matouš, Turajlic, Samra, Yang, Guang
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866929633480409088
author Elphick, Matouš
Turajlic, Samra
Yang, Guang
author_facet Elphick, Matouš
Turajlic, Samra
Yang, Guang
contents Self-supervised foundation models for digital pathology encode small patches from H\&E whole slide images into latent representations used for downstream tasks. However, the invariance of these representations to patch rotation remains unexplored. This study investigates the rotational invariance of latent representations across twelve foundation models by quantifying the alignment between non-rotated and rotated patches using mutual $k$-nearest neighbours and cosine distance. Models that incorporated rotation augmentation during self-supervised training exhibited significantly greater invariance to rotations. We hypothesise that the absence of rotational inductive bias in the transformer architecture necessitates rotation augmentation during training to achieve learned invariance. Code: https://github.com/MatousE/rot-invariance-analysis.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_11938
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Are the Latent Representations of Foundation Models for Pathology Invariant to Rotation?
Elphick, Matouš
Turajlic, Samra
Yang, Guang
Image and Video Processing
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Self-supervised foundation models for digital pathology encode small patches from H\&E whole slide images into latent representations used for downstream tasks. However, the invariance of these representations to patch rotation remains unexplored. This study investigates the rotational invariance of latent representations across twelve foundation models by quantifying the alignment between non-rotated and rotated patches using mutual $k$-nearest neighbours and cosine distance. Models that incorporated rotation augmentation during self-supervised training exhibited significantly greater invariance to rotations. We hypothesise that the absence of rotational inductive bias in the transformer architecture necessitates rotation augmentation during training to achieve learned invariance. Code: https://github.com/MatousE/rot-invariance-analysis.
title Are the Latent Representations of Foundation Models for Pathology Invariant to Rotation?
topic Image and Video Processing
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11938