FactEHR: A Dataset for Evaluating Factuality in Clinical Notes Using LLMs

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munnangi, Monica, Swaminathan, Akshay, Fries, Jason Alan, Jindal, Jenelle, Narayanan, Sanjana, Lopez, Ivan, Tu, Lucia, Chung, Philip, Omiye, Jesutofunmi A., Kashyap, Mehr, Shah, Nigam
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908723836878848
author Munnangi, Monica
Swaminathan, Akshay
Fries, Jason Alan
Jindal, Jenelle
Narayanan, Sanjana
Lopez, Ivan
Tu, Lucia
Chung, Philip
Omiye, Jesutofunmi A.
Kashyap, Mehr
Shah, Nigam
author_facet Munnangi, Monica
Swaminathan, Akshay
Fries, Jason Alan
Jindal, Jenelle
Narayanan, Sanjana
Lopez, Ivan
Tu, Lucia
Chung, Philip
Omiye, Jesutofunmi A.
Kashyap, Mehr
Shah, Nigam
contents Verifying and attributing factual claims is essential for the safe and effective use of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare. A core component of factuality evaluation is fact decomposition, the process of breaking down complex clinical statements into fine-grained atomic facts for verification. Recent work has proposed fact decomposition, which uses LLMs to rewrite source text into concise sentences conveying a single piece of information, to facilitate fine-grained fact verification. However, clinical documentation poses unique challenges for fact decomposition due to dense terminology and diverse note types and remains understudied. To address this gap and explore these challenges, we present FactEHR, an NLI dataset consisting of document fact decompositions for 2,168 clinical notes spanning four types from three hospital systems, resulting in 987,266 entailment pairs. We assess the generated facts on different axes, from entailment evaluation of LLMs to a qualitative analysis. Our evaluation, including review by the clinicians, reveals substantial variability in LLM performance for fact decomposition. For example, Gemini-1.5-Flash consistently generates relevant and accurate facts, while Llama-3 8B produces fewer and less consistent outputs. The results underscore the need for better LLM capabilities to support factual verification in clinical text.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_12422
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle FactEHR: A Dataset for Evaluating Factuality in Clinical Notes Using LLMs
Munnangi, Monica
Swaminathan, Akshay
Fries, Jason Alan
Jindal, Jenelle
Narayanan, Sanjana
Lopez, Ivan
Tu, Lucia
Chung, Philip
Omiye, Jesutofunmi A.
Kashyap, Mehr
Shah, Nigam
Computation and Language
Verifying and attributing factual claims is essential for the safe and effective use of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare. A core component of factuality evaluation is fact decomposition, the process of breaking down complex clinical statements into fine-grained atomic facts for verification. Recent work has proposed fact decomposition, which uses LLMs to rewrite source text into concise sentences conveying a single piece of information, to facilitate fine-grained fact verification. However, clinical documentation poses unique challenges for fact decomposition due to dense terminology and diverse note types and remains understudied. To address this gap and explore these challenges, we present FactEHR, an NLI dataset consisting of document fact decompositions for 2,168 clinical notes spanning four types from three hospital systems, resulting in 987,266 entailment pairs. We assess the generated facts on different axes, from entailment evaluation of LLMs to a qualitative analysis. Our evaluation, including review by the clinicians, reveals substantial variability in LLM performance for fact decomposition. For example, Gemini-1.5-Flash consistently generates relevant and accurate facts, while Llama-3 8B produces fewer and less consistent outputs. The results underscore the need for better LLM capabilities to support factual verification in clinical text.
title FactEHR: A Dataset for Evaluating Factuality in Clinical Notes Using LLMs
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12422