DateLogicQA: Benchmarking Temporal Biases in Large Language Models

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhatia, Gagan, Tang, MingZe, Mahanta, Cristina, Kazi, Madiha
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915292243820544
author Bhatia, Gagan
Tang, MingZe
Mahanta, Cristina
Kazi, Madiha
author_facet Bhatia, Gagan
Tang, MingZe
Mahanta, Cristina
Kazi, Madiha
contents This paper introduces DateLogicQA, a benchmark with 190 questions covering diverse date formats, temporal contexts, and reasoning types. We propose the Semantic Integrity Metric to assess tokenization quality and analyse two biases: Representation-Level Bias, affecting embeddings, and Logical-Level Bias, influencing reasoning outputs. Our findings provide a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' capabilities and limitations in temporal reasoning, highlighting key challenges in handling temporal data accurately.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_13377
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle DateLogicQA: Benchmarking Temporal Biases in Large Language Models
Bhatia, Gagan
Tang, MingZe
Mahanta, Cristina
Kazi, Madiha
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
This paper introduces DateLogicQA, a benchmark with 190 questions covering diverse date formats, temporal contexts, and reasoning types. We propose the Semantic Integrity Metric to assess tokenization quality and analyse two biases: Representation-Level Bias, affecting embeddings, and Logical-Level Bias, influencing reasoning outputs. Our findings provide a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' capabilities and limitations in temporal reasoning, highlighting key challenges in handling temporal data accurately.
title DateLogicQA: Benchmarking Temporal Biases in Large Language Models
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13377