Comparative Analysis of YOLOv9, YOLOv10 and RT-DETR for Real-Time Weed Detection
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866913673664004096 |
|---|---|
| author | Saltık, Ahmet Oğuz Allmendinger, Alicia Stein, Anthony |
| author_facet | Saltık, Ahmet Oğuz Allmendinger, Alicia Stein, Anthony |
| contents | This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art object detection models, including YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and RT-DETR, for the task of weed detection in smart-spraying applications focusing on three classes: Sugarbeet, Monocot, and Dicot. The performance of these models is compared based on mean Average Precision (mAP) scores and inference times on different GPU and CPU devices. We consider various model variations, such as nano, small, medium, large alongside different image resolutions (320px, 480px, 640px, 800px, 960px). The results highlight the trade-offs between inference time and detection accuracy, providing valuable insights for selecting the most suitable model for real-time weed detection. This study aims to guide the development of efficient and effective smart spraying systems, enhancing agricultural productivity through precise weed management. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_13490 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Comparative Analysis of YOLOv9, YOLOv10 and RT-DETR for Real-Time Weed Detection Saltık, Ahmet Oğuz Allmendinger, Alicia Stein, Anthony Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art object detection models, including YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and RT-DETR, for the task of weed detection in smart-spraying applications focusing on three classes: Sugarbeet, Monocot, and Dicot. The performance of these models is compared based on mean Average Precision (mAP) scores and inference times on different GPU and CPU devices. We consider various model variations, such as nano, small, medium, large alongside different image resolutions (320px, 480px, 640px, 800px, 960px). The results highlight the trade-offs between inference time and detection accuracy, providing valuable insights for selecting the most suitable model for real-time weed detection. This study aims to guide the development of efficient and effective smart spraying systems, enhancing agricultural productivity through precise weed management. |
| title | Comparative Analysis of YOLOv9, YOLOv10 and RT-DETR for Real-Time Weed Detection |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13490 |