Cover Image

Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Church, Kenneth, Chandrasekar, Raman, Ortega, John E., Ahmad, Ibrahim Said
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Nollywood: Let's Go to the Movies!
by: Ortega, John E., et al.
Published: (2024)

On Translating Technical Terminology: A Translation Workflow for Machine-Translated Acronyms
by: Yue, Richard, et al.
Published: (2024)

No Culture Left Behind: ArtELingo-28, a Benchmark of WikiArt with Captions in 28 Languages
by: Mohamed, Youssef, et al.
Published: (2024)

Analyzing Cultural Representations of Emotions in LLMs through Mixed Emotion Survey
by: Dudy, Shiran, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
by: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Published: (2026)

FLUX: Data Worth Training On
by: Gowtham, et al.
Published: (2026)

REM-CTX: Automated Peer Review via Reinforcement Learning with Auxiliary Context
by: Taechoyotin, Pawin, et al.
Published: (2026)

PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing
by: Żurawicki, Krzysztof, et al.
Published: (2026)

EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations
by: Zhang, Yinuo, et al.
Published: (2026)

AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifying
by: Maleki, Negar, et al.
Published: (2024)

Are Generative Language Models Multicultural? A Study on Hausa Culture and Emotions using ChatGPT
by: Ahmad, Ibrahim Said, et al.
Published: (2024)

When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews
by: Kumar, Sandeep, et al.
Published: (2026)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2025)

ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review
by: Sahu, Gaurav, et al.
Published: (2025)

PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews
by: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Published: (2025)

Not All Personas Are Worth It: Culture-Reflective Persona Data Augmentation
by: Han, Ji-Eun, et al.
Published: (2025)

Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks
by: Lin, Tzu-Ling, et al.
Published: (2025)

Learning from Committee: Reasoning Distillation from a Mixture of Teachers with Peer-Review
by: Li, Zhuochun, et al.
Published: (2024)

DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
by: Weng, Yixuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors
by: Sadallah, Abdelrahman, et al.
Published: (2025)

HausaNLP at SemEval-2025 Task 3: Towards a Fine-Grained Model-Aware Hallucination Detection
by: Bala, Maryam, et al.
Published: (2025)

L2D-Clinical: Learning to Defer for Adaptive Model Selection in Clinical Text Classification
by: Kondadadi, Rishik, et al.
Published: (2026)

Completion $\neq$ Collaboration: Scaling Collaborative Effort with Agents
by: Shen, Shannon Zejiang, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLM Review: Enhancing Creative Writing via Blind Peer Review Feedback
by: Li, Weiyue, et al.
Published: (2026)

Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process
by: Chen, Zhijun, et al.
Published: (2025)

PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on the Consistency Optimization
by: Ning, Kun-Peng, et al.
Published: (2024)

An Expert is Worth One Token: Synergizing Multiple Expert LLMs as Generalist via Expert Token Routing
by: Chai, Ziwei, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is It Thinking or Cheating? Detecting Implicit Reward Hacking by Measuring Reasoning Effort
by: Wang, Xinpeng, et al.
Published: (2025)

CoCoNUTS: Concentrating on Content while Neglecting Uninformative Textual Styles for AI-Generated Peer Review Detection
by: Chen, Yihan, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Token is Worth over 1,000 Tokens: Efficient Knowledge Distillation through Low-Rank Clone
by: Hao, Jitai, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is Escalation Worth It? A Decision-Theoretic Characterization of LLM Cascades
by: Bouchard, Dylan
Published: (2026)

The First Multilingual Model For The Detection of Suicide Texts
by: Zevallos, Rodolfo, et al.
Published: (2024)

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review
by: Lin, Zhicheng
Published: (2025)

Turn Waste into Worth: Rectifying Top-$k$ Router of MoE
by: Zeng, Zhiyuan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Programming by Backprop: An Instruction is Worth 100 Examples When Finetuning LLMs
by: Cook, Jonathan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Semantic Role Labeling of NomBank Partitives
by: Meyers, Adam, et al.
Published: (2024)

Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable
by: Saha, Rounak, et al.
Published: (2026)

Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactions
by: Tan, Cheng, et al.
Published: (2024)

Assessing Human Editing Effort on LLM-Generated Texts via Compression-Based Edit Distance
by: Devatine, Nicolas, et al.
Published: (2024)