Good Controls Gone Bad: Difference-in-Differences with Covariates

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karim, Sunny, Webb, Matthew D.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909702899630080
author Karim, Sunny
Webb, Matthew D.
author_facet Karim, Sunny
Webb, Matthew D.
contents This paper introduces the two-way common causal covariates (CCC) assumption, which is necessary to get an unbiased estimate of the ATT when using time-varying covariates in existing Difference-in-Differences methods. The two-way CCC assumption implies that the effect of the covariates remain the same between groups and across time periods. This assumption has been implied in previous literature, but has not been explicitly addressed. Through theoretical proofs and a Monte Carlo simulation study, we show that the standard TWFE and the CS-DID estimators are biased when the two-way CCC assumption is violated. We propose a new estimator called the Intersection Difference-in-differences (DID-INT) which can provide an unbiased estimate of the ATT under two-way CCC violations. DID-INT can also identify the ATT under heterogeneous treatment effects and with staggered treatment rollout. The estimator relies on parallel trends of the residuals of the outcome variable, after appropriately adjusting for covariates. This covariate residualization can recover parallel trends that are hidden with conventional estimators.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_14447
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Good Controls Gone Bad: Difference-in-Differences with Covariates
Karim, Sunny
Webb, Matthew D.
Econometrics
This paper introduces the two-way common causal covariates (CCC) assumption, which is necessary to get an unbiased estimate of the ATT when using time-varying covariates in existing Difference-in-Differences methods. The two-way CCC assumption implies that the effect of the covariates remain the same between groups and across time periods. This assumption has been implied in previous literature, but has not been explicitly addressed. Through theoretical proofs and a Monte Carlo simulation study, we show that the standard TWFE and the CS-DID estimators are biased when the two-way CCC assumption is violated. We propose a new estimator called the Intersection Difference-in-differences (DID-INT) which can provide an unbiased estimate of the ATT under two-way CCC violations. DID-INT can also identify the ATT under heterogeneous treatment effects and with staggered treatment rollout. The estimator relies on parallel trends of the residuals of the outcome variable, after appropriately adjusting for covariates. This covariate residualization can recover parallel trends that are hidden with conventional estimators.
title Good Controls Gone Bad: Difference-in-Differences with Covariates
topic Econometrics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14447