_version_ 1866910767095218176
author Stragapede, Giuseppe
Vera-Rodriguez, Ruben
Tolosana, Ruben
Morales, Aythami
DeAndres-Tame, Ivan
Damer, Naser
Fierrez, Julian
Ortega-Garcia, Javier
Acien, Alejandro
Gonzalez, Nahuel
Shadrikov, Andrei
Gordin, Dmitrii
Schmitt, Leon
Wimmer, Daniel
Großmann, Christoph
Krieger, Joerdis
Heinz, Florian
Krestel, Ron
Mayer, Christoffer
Haberl, Simon
Gschrey, Helena
Yamagishi, Yosuke
Saha, Sanjay
Rasnayaka, Sanka
Wickramanayake, Sandareka
Sim, Terence
Gutfeter, Weronika
Baran, Adam
Krzysztoń, Mateusz
Jaskóła, Przemysław
author_facet Stragapede, Giuseppe
Vera-Rodriguez, Ruben
Tolosana, Ruben
Morales, Aythami
DeAndres-Tame, Ivan
Damer, Naser
Fierrez, Julian
Ortega-Garcia, Javier
Acien, Alejandro
Gonzalez, Nahuel
Shadrikov, Andrei
Gordin, Dmitrii
Schmitt, Leon
Wimmer, Daniel
Großmann, Christoph
Krieger, Joerdis
Heinz, Florian
Krestel, Ron
Mayer, Christoffer
Haberl, Simon
Gschrey, Helena
Yamagishi, Yosuke
Saha, Sanjay
Rasnayaka, Sanka
Wickramanayake, Sandareka
Sim, Terence
Gutfeter, Weronika
Baran, Adam
Krzysztoń, Mateusz
Jaskóła, Przemysław
contents This article presents the Keystroke Verification Challenge - onGoing (KVC-onGoing), on which researchers can easily benchmark their systems in a common platform using large-scale public databases, the Aalto University Keystroke databases, and a standard experimental protocol. The keystroke data consist of tweet-long sequences of variable transcript text from over 185,000 subjects, acquired through desktop and mobile keyboards simulating real-life conditions. The results on the evaluation set of KVC-onGoing have proved the high discriminative power of keystroke dynamics, reaching values as low as 3.33% of Equal Error Rate (EER) and 11.96% of False Non-Match Rate (FNMR) @1% False Match Rate (FMR) in the desktop scenario, and 3.61% of EER and 17.44% of FNMR @1% at FMR in the mobile scenario, significantly improving previous state-of-the-art results. Concerning demographic fairness, the analyzed scores reflect the subjects' age and gender to various extents, not negligible in a few cases. The framework runs on CodaLab.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2412_20530
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle KVC-onGoing: Keystroke Verification Challenge
Stragapede, Giuseppe
Vera-Rodriguez, Ruben
Tolosana, Ruben
Morales, Aythami
DeAndres-Tame, Ivan
Damer, Naser
Fierrez, Julian
Ortega-Garcia, Javier
Acien, Alejandro
Gonzalez, Nahuel
Shadrikov, Andrei
Gordin, Dmitrii
Schmitt, Leon
Wimmer, Daniel
Großmann, Christoph
Krieger, Joerdis
Heinz, Florian
Krestel, Ron
Mayer, Christoffer
Haberl, Simon
Gschrey, Helena
Yamagishi, Yosuke
Saha, Sanjay
Rasnayaka, Sanka
Wickramanayake, Sandareka
Sim, Terence
Gutfeter, Weronika
Baran, Adam
Krzysztoń, Mateusz
Jaskóła, Przemysław
Human-Computer Interaction
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
This article presents the Keystroke Verification Challenge - onGoing (KVC-onGoing), on which researchers can easily benchmark their systems in a common platform using large-scale public databases, the Aalto University Keystroke databases, and a standard experimental protocol. The keystroke data consist of tweet-long sequences of variable transcript text from over 185,000 subjects, acquired through desktop and mobile keyboards simulating real-life conditions. The results on the evaluation set of KVC-onGoing have proved the high discriminative power of keystroke dynamics, reaching values as low as 3.33% of Equal Error Rate (EER) and 11.96% of False Non-Match Rate (FNMR) @1% False Match Rate (FMR) in the desktop scenario, and 3.61% of EER and 17.44% of FNMR @1% at FMR in the mobile scenario, significantly improving previous state-of-the-art results. Concerning demographic fairness, the analyzed scores reflect the subjects' age and gender to various extents, not negligible in a few cases. The framework runs on CodaLab.
title KVC-onGoing: Keystroke Verification Challenge
topic Human-Computer Interaction
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20530