Strategies and Challenges of Timestamp Tampering for Improved Digital Forensic Event Reconstruction (extended version)
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866909445825495040 |
|---|---|
| author | Vanini, Céline Gruber, Jan Hargreaves, Christopher Benenson, Zinaida Freiling, Felix Breitinger, Frank |
| author_facet | Vanini, Céline Gruber, Jan Hargreaves, Christopher Benenson, Zinaida Freiling, Felix Breitinger, Frank |
| contents | Timestamps play a pivotal role in digital forensic event reconstruction, but due to their non-essential nature, tampering or manipulation of timestamps is possible by users in multiple ways, even on running systems. This has a significant effect on the reliability of the results from applying a timeline analysis as part of an investigation. In this paper, we investigate the problem of users tampering with timestamps on a running (``live'') system. While prior work has shown that digital evidence tampering is hard, we focus on the question of \emph{why} this is so. By performing a qualitative user study with advanced university students, we observe, for example, a commonly applied multi-step approach in order to deal with second-order traces (traces of traces). We also derive factors that influence the reliability of successful tampering, such as the individual knowledge about temporal traces, and technical restrictions to change them. These insights help to assess the reliability of timestamps from individual artifacts that are relied on for event reconstruction and subsequently reduce the risk of incorrect event reconstruction during investigations. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_00175 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Strategies and Challenges of Timestamp Tampering for Improved Digital Forensic Event Reconstruction (extended version) Vanini, Céline Gruber, Jan Hargreaves, Christopher Benenson, Zinaida Freiling, Felix Breitinger, Frank Cryptography and Security Timestamps play a pivotal role in digital forensic event reconstruction, but due to their non-essential nature, tampering or manipulation of timestamps is possible by users in multiple ways, even on running systems. This has a significant effect on the reliability of the results from applying a timeline analysis as part of an investigation. In this paper, we investigate the problem of users tampering with timestamps on a running (``live'') system. While prior work has shown that digital evidence tampering is hard, we focus on the question of \emph{why} this is so. By performing a qualitative user study with advanced university students, we observe, for example, a commonly applied multi-step approach in order to deal with second-order traces (traces of traces). We also derive factors that influence the reliability of successful tampering, such as the individual knowledge about temporal traces, and technical restrictions to change them. These insights help to assess the reliability of timestamps from individual artifacts that are relied on for event reconstruction and subsequently reduce the risk of incorrect event reconstruction during investigations. |
| title | Strategies and Challenges of Timestamp Tampering for Improved Digital Forensic Event Reconstruction (extended version) |
| topic | Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00175 |