Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gao, Jie, Shu, Zhiyao, Yeo, Shun Yi, Prakash, Alok, Huang, Chien-Ming, Dredze, Mark, Xiao, Ziang
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00775
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914115645079552
author Gao, Jie
Shu, Zhiyao
Yeo, Shun Yi
Prakash, Alok
Huang, Chien-Ming
Dredze, Mark
Xiao, Ziang
author_facet Gao, Jie
Shu, Zhiyao
Yeo, Shun Yi
Prakash, Alok
Huang, Chien-Ming
Dredze, Mark
Xiao, Ziang
contents Qualitative data analysis (QDA) emphasizes trustworthiness, requiring sustained human engagement and reflexivity. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been applied in QDA to improve efficiency. However, their use raises concerns about unvalidated automation and displaced sensemaking, which can undermine trustworthiness. To address these issues, we employed two strategies: transparency and human involvement. Through a literature review and formative interviews, we identified six design requirements for transparent automation and meaningful human involvement. Guided by these requirements, we developed MindCoder, an LLM-powered workflow that delegates mechanical tasks, such as grouping and validation, to the system, while enabling humans to conduct meaningful interpretation. MindCoder also maintains comprehensive logs of users' step-by-step interactions to ensure transparency and support trustworthy results. In an evaluation with 12 users and two external evaluators, MindCoder supported active interpretation, offered flexible control, and produced more trustworthy codebooks. We further discuss design implications for building human-AI collaborative QDA workflows.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_00775
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Efficiency with Rigor! A Trustworthy LLM-powered Workflow for Qualitative Data Analysis
Gao, Jie
Shu, Zhiyao
Yeo, Shun Yi
Prakash, Alok
Huang, Chien-Ming
Dredze, Mark
Xiao, Ziang
Human-Computer Interaction
Qualitative data analysis (QDA) emphasizes trustworthiness, requiring sustained human engagement and reflexivity. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been applied in QDA to improve efficiency. However, their use raises concerns about unvalidated automation and displaced sensemaking, which can undermine trustworthiness. To address these issues, we employed two strategies: transparency and human involvement. Through a literature review and formative interviews, we identified six design requirements for transparent automation and meaningful human involvement. Guided by these requirements, we developed MindCoder, an LLM-powered workflow that delegates mechanical tasks, such as grouping and validation, to the system, while enabling humans to conduct meaningful interpretation. MindCoder also maintains comprehensive logs of users' step-by-step interactions to ensure transparency and support trustworthy results. In an evaluation with 12 users and two external evaluators, MindCoder supported active interpretation, offered flexible control, and produced more trustworthy codebooks. We further discuss design implications for building human-AI collaborative QDA workflows.
title Efficiency with Rigor! A Trustworthy LLM-powered Workflow for Qualitative Data Analysis
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00775