Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakizadeh, Mahdi, Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915510098067456
author Zakizadeh, Mahdi
Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher
author_facet Zakizadeh, Mahdi
Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher
contents Accurately measuring gender stereotypical bias in language models is a complex task with many hidden aspects. Current benchmarks have underestimated this multifaceted challenge and failed to capture the full extent of the problem. This paper examines the inconsistencies between intrinsic stereotype benchmarks. We propose that currently available benchmarks each capture only partial facets of gender stereotypes, and when considered in isolation, they provide just a fragmented view of the broader landscape of bias in language models. Using StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs as case studies, we investigated how data distribution affects benchmark results. By applying a framework from social psychology to balance the data of these benchmarks across various components of gender stereotypes, we demonstrated that even simple balancing techniques can significantly improve the correlation between different measurement approaches. Our findings underscore the complexity of gender stereotyping in language models and point to new directions for developing more refined techniques to detect and reduce bias.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_01168
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets
Zakizadeh, Mahdi
Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Accurately measuring gender stereotypical bias in language models is a complex task with many hidden aspects. Current benchmarks have underestimated this multifaceted challenge and failed to capture the full extent of the problem. This paper examines the inconsistencies between intrinsic stereotype benchmarks. We propose that currently available benchmarks each capture only partial facets of gender stereotypes, and when considered in isolation, they provide just a fragmented view of the broader landscape of bias in language models. Using StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs as case studies, we investigated how data distribution affects benchmark results. By applying a framework from social psychology to balance the data of these benchmarks across various components of gender stereotypes, we demonstrated that even simple balancing techniques can significantly improve the correlation between different measurement approaches. Our findings underscore the complexity of gender stereotyping in language models and point to new directions for developing more refined techniques to detect and reduce bias.
title Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01168