Practical Quantum Circuit Implementation for Simulating Coupled Classical Oscillators

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luangsirapornchai, Natt, Sanglaor, Peeranat, Sornsaeng, Apimuk, Bressan, Stephane, Chotibut, Thiparat, Suksen, Kamonluk, Chongstitvatana, Prabhas
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917889206910976
author Luangsirapornchai, Natt
Sanglaor, Peeranat
Sornsaeng, Apimuk
Bressan, Stephane
Chotibut, Thiparat
Suksen, Kamonluk
Chongstitvatana, Prabhas
author_facet Luangsirapornchai, Natt
Sanglaor, Peeranat
Sornsaeng, Apimuk
Bressan, Stephane
Chotibut, Thiparat
Suksen, Kamonluk
Chongstitvatana, Prabhas
contents Simulating large-scale coupled-oscillator systems presents substantial computational challenges for classical algorithms, particularly when pursuing first-principles analyses in the thermodynamic limit. Motivated by the quantum algorithm framework proposed by Babbush et al., we present and implement a detailed quantum circuit construction for simulating one-dimensional spring-mass systems. Our approach incorporates key quantum subroutines, including block encoding, quantum singular value transformation (QSVT), and amplitude amplification, to realize the unitary time-evolution operator associated with simulating classical oscillators dynamics. In the uniform spring-mass setting, our circuit construction requires a gate complexity of $\mathcal{O}\bigl(\log_2^2 N\,\log_2(1/\varepsilon)\bigr)$, where $N$ is the number of oscillators and $\varepsilon$ is the target accuracy of the approximation. For more general, heterogeneous spring-mass systems, the total gate complexity is $\mathcal{O}\bigl(N\log_2 N\,\log_2(1/\varepsilon)\bigr)$. Both settings require $\mathcal{O}(\log_2 N)$ qubits. Numerical simulations agree with classical solvers across all tested configurations, indicating that this circuit-based Hamiltonian simulation approach can substantially reduce computational costs and potentially enable larger-scale many-body studies on future quantum hardware.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_06100
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Practical Quantum Circuit Implementation for Simulating Coupled Classical Oscillators
Luangsirapornchai, Natt
Sanglaor, Peeranat
Sornsaeng, Apimuk
Bressan, Stephane
Chotibut, Thiparat
Suksen, Kamonluk
Chongstitvatana, Prabhas
Quantum Physics
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Simulating large-scale coupled-oscillator systems presents substantial computational challenges for classical algorithms, particularly when pursuing first-principles analyses in the thermodynamic limit. Motivated by the quantum algorithm framework proposed by Babbush et al., we present and implement a detailed quantum circuit construction for simulating one-dimensional spring-mass systems. Our approach incorporates key quantum subroutines, including block encoding, quantum singular value transformation (QSVT), and amplitude amplification, to realize the unitary time-evolution operator associated with simulating classical oscillators dynamics. In the uniform spring-mass setting, our circuit construction requires a gate complexity of $\mathcal{O}\bigl(\log_2^2 N\,\log_2(1/\varepsilon)\bigr)$, where $N$ is the number of oscillators and $\varepsilon$ is the target accuracy of the approximation. For more general, heterogeneous spring-mass systems, the total gate complexity is $\mathcal{O}\bigl(N\log_2 N\,\log_2(1/\varepsilon)\bigr)$. Both settings require $\mathcal{O}(\log_2 N)$ qubits. Numerical simulations agree with classical solvers across all tested configurations, indicating that this circuit-based Hamiltonian simulation approach can substantially reduce computational costs and potentially enable larger-scale many-body studies on future quantum hardware.
title Practical Quantum Circuit Implementation for Simulating Coupled Classical Oscillators
topic Quantum Physics
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06100