A Comparison of Strategies to Embed Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Formulations Solved via Direct Transcription
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866910780665888768 |
|---|---|
| author | Casas, Carlos Andrés Elorza Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis A. Pulsipher, Joshua L. |
| author_facet | Casas, Carlos Andrés Elorza Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis A. Pulsipher, Joshua L. |
| contents | This study aims to benchmark candidate strategies for embedding neural network (NN) surrogates in nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) formulations that are subject to systems described with partial differential equations and that are solved via direct transcription (i.e., simultaneous methods). This study focuses on the use of physics-informed NNs and physics-informed convolutional NNs as the internal (surrogate) models within the NMPC formulation. One strategy embeds NN models as explicit algebraic constraints, leveraging the automatic differentiation (AD) of an algebraic modelling language (AML) to evaluate the derivatives. Alternatively, the solver can be provided with derivatives computed external to the AML via the AD routines of the machine learning environment the NN is trained in. The three numerical experiments considered in this work reveal that replacing mechanistic models with NN surrogates may not always offer computational advantages when smooth activation functions are used in conjunction with a local nonlinear solver (e.g., Ipopt), even with highly nonlinear systems. Moreover, in this context, the external function evaluation of the NN surrogates often outperforms the embedding strategies that rely on explicit algebraic constraints, likely due to the difficulty in initializing the auxiliary variables and constraints introduced by explicit algebraic reformulations. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_06335 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Comparison of Strategies to Embed Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Formulations Solved via Direct Transcription Casas, Carlos Andrés Elorza Ricardez-Sandoval, Luis A. Pulsipher, Joshua L. Systems and Control Optimization and Control This study aims to benchmark candidate strategies for embedding neural network (NN) surrogates in nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) formulations that are subject to systems described with partial differential equations and that are solved via direct transcription (i.e., simultaneous methods). This study focuses on the use of physics-informed NNs and physics-informed convolutional NNs as the internal (surrogate) models within the NMPC formulation. One strategy embeds NN models as explicit algebraic constraints, leveraging the automatic differentiation (AD) of an algebraic modelling language (AML) to evaluate the derivatives. Alternatively, the solver can be provided with derivatives computed external to the AML via the AD routines of the machine learning environment the NN is trained in. The three numerical experiments considered in this work reveal that replacing mechanistic models with NN surrogates may not always offer computational advantages when smooth activation functions are used in conjunction with a local nonlinear solver (e.g., Ipopt), even with highly nonlinear systems. Moreover, in this context, the external function evaluation of the NN surrogates often outperforms the embedding strategies that rely on explicit algebraic constraints, likely due to the difficulty in initializing the auxiliary variables and constraints introduced by explicit algebraic reformulations. |
| title | A Comparison of Strategies to Embed Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Formulations Solved via Direct Transcription |
| topic | Systems and Control Optimization and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06335 |