Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09910 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908422113329152 |
|---|---|
| author | Magnus, P. D. Buccella, Alessandra D'Cruz, Jason |
| author_facet | Magnus, P. D. Buccella, Alessandra D'Cruz, Jason |
| contents | Apologies serve essential functions for moral agents such as expressing remorse, taking responsibility, and repairing trust. LLM-based chatbots routinely produce output that has the linguistic form of an apology. However, they do this simply because they are echoing the kinds of things that humans say. Moreover, there are reasons to think that chatbots are not the kind of linguistic or moral agents capable of apology. To put the point bluntly: Chatbot apologies are bullshit. This paper explores this concern and develops it beyond the epithet, drawing on the nature of morally serious apologies, the linguistic agency required to perform them, and the moral agency required for them to matter. We conclude by considering some consequences for how chatbots should be designed and how we ought to think about them. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_09910 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Chatbot apologies: Beyond bullshit Magnus, P. D. Buccella, Alessandra D'Cruz, Jason Human-Computer Interaction Apologies serve essential functions for moral agents such as expressing remorse, taking responsibility, and repairing trust. LLM-based chatbots routinely produce output that has the linguistic form of an apology. However, they do this simply because they are echoing the kinds of things that humans say. Moreover, there are reasons to think that chatbots are not the kind of linguistic or moral agents capable of apology. To put the point bluntly: Chatbot apologies are bullshit. This paper explores this concern and develops it beyond the epithet, drawing on the nature of morally serious apologies, the linguistic agency required to perform them, and the moral agency required for them to matter. We conclude by considering some consequences for how chatbots should be designed and how we ought to think about them. |
| title | Chatbot apologies: Beyond bullshit |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09910 |