Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14345 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866917901684965376 |
|---|---|
| author | Sommers, Dominique Sidorova, Natalia van Dongen, Boudewijn |
| author_facet | Sommers, Dominique Sidorova, Natalia van Dongen, Boudewijn |
| contents | The assessment of process mining techniques using real-life data is often compromised by the lack of ground truth knowledge, the presence of non-essential outliers in system behavior and recording errors in event logs. Using synthetically generated data could leverage ground truth for better evaluation. Existing log generation tools inject noise directly into the logs, which does not capture many typical behavioral deviations. Furthermore, the link between the model and the log, which is needed for later assessment, becomes lost.
We propose a ground-truth approach for generating process data from either existing or synthetic initial process models, whether automatically generated or hand-made. This approach incorporates patterns of behavioral deviations and recording errors to produce a synthetic yet realistic deviating model and imperfect event log. These, together with the initial model, are required to assess process mining techniques based on ground truth knowledge. We demonstrate this approach to create datasets of synthetic process data for three processes, one of which we used in a conformance checking use case, focusing on the assessment of (relaxed) systemic alignments to expose and explain deviations in modeled and recorded behavior. Our results show that this approach, unlike traditional methods, provides detailed insights into the strengths and weaknesses of process mining techniques, both quantitatively and qualitatively. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_14345 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Ground Truth Approach for Assessing Process Mining Techniques Sommers, Dominique Sidorova, Natalia van Dongen, Boudewijn Databases The assessment of process mining techniques using real-life data is often compromised by the lack of ground truth knowledge, the presence of non-essential outliers in system behavior and recording errors in event logs. Using synthetically generated data could leverage ground truth for better evaluation. Existing log generation tools inject noise directly into the logs, which does not capture many typical behavioral deviations. Furthermore, the link between the model and the log, which is needed for later assessment, becomes lost. We propose a ground-truth approach for generating process data from either existing or synthetic initial process models, whether automatically generated or hand-made. This approach incorporates patterns of behavioral deviations and recording errors to produce a synthetic yet realistic deviating model and imperfect event log. These, together with the initial model, are required to assess process mining techniques based on ground truth knowledge. We demonstrate this approach to create datasets of synthetic process data for three processes, one of which we used in a conformance checking use case, focusing on the assessment of (relaxed) systemic alignments to expose and explain deviations in modeled and recorded behavior. Our results show that this approach, unlike traditional methods, provides detailed insights into the strengths and weaknesses of process mining techniques, both quantitatively and qualitatively. |
| title | A Ground Truth Approach for Assessing Process Mining Techniques |
| topic | Databases |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14345 |