Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15988 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916824784830464 |
|---|---|
| author | Dunnett, K. Magnusson, M. H. |
| author_facet | Dunnett, K. Magnusson, M. H. |
| contents | One of the key skills of a researcher is noticing what's going on. Both in the experiment one's performing and in one's data: is there something interesting, reason to doubt one's data or suspect that one's theoretical description is insufficient? Many experiments developed for undergraduate teaching still focus on quantitative evaluation. Here we take an alternative approach where careful observation identifies the interesting qualitative behaviour of a ball dropped with a water bottle balanced on top of it, but where numerical agreement with a simple theoretical model is impossible. Thus 'success' occurs when students are satisfied with their efforts and the development of their experimental process. Laboratory note keeping can also be introduced in a meaningful, non-formulaic way since students are making independent observations and method changes. We describe pedagogical and didactic considerations for the implementation of the experiment in a classroom, including variations and extensions, and give examples of experimental outcomes. We suggest that considering qualitative behaviour may be a fruitful strategy for identifying experiments that are both amenable to student autonomy and embedding skills such as laboratory note keeping in a flexible and genuine way. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_15988 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Qualitative observations in university physics laboratories: an example from classical mechanics Dunnett, K. Magnusson, M. H. Physics Education One of the key skills of a researcher is noticing what's going on. Both in the experiment one's performing and in one's data: is there something interesting, reason to doubt one's data or suspect that one's theoretical description is insufficient? Many experiments developed for undergraduate teaching still focus on quantitative evaluation. Here we take an alternative approach where careful observation identifies the interesting qualitative behaviour of a ball dropped with a water bottle balanced on top of it, but where numerical agreement with a simple theoretical model is impossible. Thus 'success' occurs when students are satisfied with their efforts and the development of their experimental process. Laboratory note keeping can also be introduced in a meaningful, non-formulaic way since students are making independent observations and method changes. We describe pedagogical and didactic considerations for the implementation of the experiment in a classroom, including variations and extensions, and give examples of experimental outcomes. We suggest that considering qualitative behaviour may be a fruitful strategy for identifying experiments that are both amenable to student autonomy and embedding skills such as laboratory note keeping in a flexible and genuine way. |
| title | Qualitative observations in university physics laboratories: an example from classical mechanics |
| topic | Physics Education |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15988 |