Why is the category of near-vector spaces abelian?

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Janelidze, Zurab, Marques, Sophie, Moore, Daniella
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866912207216836608
author Janelidze, Zurab
Marques, Sophie
Moore, Daniella
author_facet Janelidze, Zurab
Marques, Sophie
Moore, Daniella
contents In this paper we present a unified proof of the fact that the category of modules over a ring and the category of near-vector spaces in the sense of J. André, over an appropriate scalar system (a 'scalar group'), are both abelian categories. The unification is possible by viewing each of these categories as subcategories of the (abelian) category of modules over a multiplicative monoid $M$. Although in the case of near-vector spaces all elements of $M$ except one (the 'zero' element) are invertible, we show that this requirement is not necessary for the corresponding category to be abelian in analogy to the well-known fact that modules over a ring form an abelian category even if the ring is not a field (i.e., modules over it are not vector spaces).
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_16897
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Why is the category of near-vector spaces abelian?
Janelidze, Zurab
Marques, Sophie
Moore, Daniella
Rings and Algebras
In this paper we present a unified proof of the fact that the category of modules over a ring and the category of near-vector spaces in the sense of J. André, over an appropriate scalar system (a 'scalar group'), are both abelian categories. The unification is possible by viewing each of these categories as subcategories of the (abelian) category of modules over a multiplicative monoid $M$. Although in the case of near-vector spaces all elements of $M$ except one (the 'zero' element) are invertible, we show that this requirement is not necessary for the corresponding category to be abelian in analogy to the well-known fact that modules over a ring form an abelian category even if the ring is not a field (i.e., modules over it are not vector spaces).
title Why is the category of near-vector spaces abelian?
topic Rings and Algebras
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16897