A Tale of Three Location Trackers: AirTag, SmartTag, and Tile
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866917904915628032 |
|---|---|
| author | Jang, HyunSeok Daniel Ibrahim, Hazem Asim, Rohail Varvello, Matteo Zaki, Yasir |
| author_facet | Jang, HyunSeok Daniel Ibrahim, Hazem Asim, Rohail Varvello, Matteo Zaki, Yasir |
| contents | Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) location trackers, or "tags", are popular consumer devices for monitoring personal items. These tags rely on their respective network of companion devices that are capable of detecting their BLE signals and relay location information back to the owner. While manufacturers claim that such crowd-sourced approach yields accurate location tracking, the tags' real-world performance characteristics remain insufficiently understood. To this end, this study presents a comprehensive analysis of three major players in the market: Apple's AirTag, Samsung's SmartTag, and Tile. Our methodology combines controlled experiments -- with a known large distribution of location-reporting devices -- as well as in-the-wild experiments -- with no control on the number and kind of reporting devices encountered, thus emulating real-life use-cases. Leveraging data collection techniques improved from prior research, we recruit 22 volunteers traveling across 29 countries, examining the tags' performance under various environments and conditions. Our findings highlight crucial updates in device behavior since previous studies, with AirTag showing marked improvements in location report frequency. Companion device density emerged as the primary determinant of tag performance, overshadowing technological differences between products. Additionally, we find that post-COVID-19 mobility trends could have contributed to enhanced performance for AirTag and SmartTag. Tile, despite its cross-platform compatibility, exhibited notably lower accuracy, particularly in Asia and Africa, due to limited global adoption. Statistical modeling of spatial errors -- measured as the distance between reported and actual tag locations -- shows log-normal distributions across all tags, highlighting the need for improved location estimation methods to reduce occasional significant inaccuracies. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_17452 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Tale of Three Location Trackers: AirTag, SmartTag, and Tile Jang, HyunSeok Daniel Ibrahim, Hazem Asim, Rohail Varvello, Matteo Zaki, Yasir Performance Computers and Society Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) location trackers, or "tags", are popular consumer devices for monitoring personal items. These tags rely on their respective network of companion devices that are capable of detecting their BLE signals and relay location information back to the owner. While manufacturers claim that such crowd-sourced approach yields accurate location tracking, the tags' real-world performance characteristics remain insufficiently understood. To this end, this study presents a comprehensive analysis of three major players in the market: Apple's AirTag, Samsung's SmartTag, and Tile. Our methodology combines controlled experiments -- with a known large distribution of location-reporting devices -- as well as in-the-wild experiments -- with no control on the number and kind of reporting devices encountered, thus emulating real-life use-cases. Leveraging data collection techniques improved from prior research, we recruit 22 volunteers traveling across 29 countries, examining the tags' performance under various environments and conditions. Our findings highlight crucial updates in device behavior since previous studies, with AirTag showing marked improvements in location report frequency. Companion device density emerged as the primary determinant of tag performance, overshadowing technological differences between products. Additionally, we find that post-COVID-19 mobility trends could have contributed to enhanced performance for AirTag and SmartTag. Tile, despite its cross-platform compatibility, exhibited notably lower accuracy, particularly in Asia and Africa, due to limited global adoption. Statistical modeling of spatial errors -- measured as the distance between reported and actual tag locations -- shows log-normal distributions across all tags, highlighting the need for improved location estimation methods to reduce occasional significant inaccuracies. |
| title | A Tale of Three Location Trackers: AirTag, SmartTag, and Tile |
| topic | Performance Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17452 |