Machine Learning Fairness for Depression Detection using EEG Data
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866929692446031872 |
|---|---|
| author | Kwok, Angus Man Ho Cheong, Jiaee Kalkan, Sinan Gunes, Hatice |
| author_facet | Kwok, Angus Man Ho Cheong, Jiaee Kalkan, Sinan Gunes, Hatice |
| contents | This paper presents the very first attempt to evaluate machine learning fairness for depression detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) data. We conduct experiments using different deep learning architectures such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks across three EEG datasets: Mumtaz, MODMA and Rest. We employ five different bias mitigation strategies at the pre-, in- and post-processing stages and evaluate their effectiveness. Our experimental results show that bias exists in existing EEG datasets and algorithms for depression detection, and different bias mitigation methods address bias at different levels across different fairness measures. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2501_18192 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Machine Learning Fairness for Depression Detection using EEG Data Kwok, Angus Man Ho Cheong, Jiaee Kalkan, Sinan Gunes, Hatice Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning Signal Processing This paper presents the very first attempt to evaluate machine learning fairness for depression detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) data. We conduct experiments using different deep learning architectures such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks across three EEG datasets: Mumtaz, MODMA and Rest. We employ five different bias mitigation strategies at the pre-, in- and post-processing stages and evaluate their effectiveness. Our experimental results show that bias exists in existing EEG datasets and algorithms for depression detection, and different bias mitigation methods address bias at different levels across different fairness measures. |
| title | Machine Learning Fairness for Depression Detection using EEG Data |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning Signal Processing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18192 |