Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hostetler, Leon, Clark, M. A., DeTar, Carleton, Gottlieb, Steven, Weinberg, Evan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910808201494528
author Hostetler, Leon
Clark, M. A.
DeTar, Carleton
Gottlieb, Steven
Weinberg, Evan
author_facet Hostetler, Leon
Clark, M. A.
DeTar, Carleton
Gottlieb, Steven
Weinberg, Evan
contents Typically, the conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm employs mixed precision and even-odd preconditioning to compute propagators for highly improved staggered quarks (HISQ). This approach suffers from critical slowing down as the light quark mass is decreased to its physical value. Multigrid is one alternative to combat critical slowing down; however, it involves setup costs that are not always easy to amortize. We consider deflation, which can also remove critical slowing down, but incurs its own setup cost to compute eigenvectors. Results using the MILC and QUDA software libraries to generate eigenvectors and to perform deflated solves on lattices up to $144^3 \times 288$ (with lattice spacing 0.04 fm) and with a range of quark masses from the physical strange down to the physical light quark values will be presented. We compare with CG and comment on deflation versus multigrid.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_00152
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Improving HISQ propagator solves using deflation
Hostetler, Leon
Clark, M. A.
DeTar, Carleton
Gottlieb, Steven
Weinberg, Evan
High Energy Physics - Lattice
Computational Physics
Typically, the conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm employs mixed precision and even-odd preconditioning to compute propagators for highly improved staggered quarks (HISQ). This approach suffers from critical slowing down as the light quark mass is decreased to its physical value. Multigrid is one alternative to combat critical slowing down; however, it involves setup costs that are not always easy to amortize. We consider deflation, which can also remove critical slowing down, but incurs its own setup cost to compute eigenvectors. Results using the MILC and QUDA software libraries to generate eigenvectors and to perform deflated solves on lattices up to $144^3 \times 288$ (with lattice spacing 0.04 fm) and with a range of quark masses from the physical strange down to the physical light quark values will be presented. We compare with CG and comment on deflation versus multigrid.
title Improving HISQ propagator solves using deflation
topic High Energy Physics - Lattice
Computational Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00152