ReasoningWeekly: A General Knowledge and Verbal Reasoning Challenge for Large Language Models
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866909927369342976 |
|---|---|
| author | Wu, Zixuan Lucchetti, Francesca Boruch-Gruszecki, Aleksander Zhao, Jingmiao Anderson, Carolyn Jane Biswas, Joydeep Cassano, Federico Guha, Arjun |
| author_facet | Wu, Zixuan Lucchetti, Francesca Boruch-Gruszecki, Aleksander Zhao, Jingmiao Anderson, Carolyn Jane Biswas, Joydeep Cassano, Federico Guha, Arjun |
| contents | Existing benchmarks for frontier models often test specialized, "PhD-level" knowledge that is difficult for non-experts to grasp. In contrast, we present a benchmark with 613 problems based on the NPR Sunday Puzzle Challenge that requires only general knowledge. Our benchmark is challenging for both humans and models; however correct solutions are easy to verify, and models' mistakes are easy to spot. As LLMs are more widely deployed in society, we believe it is useful to develop benchmarks for frontier models that humans can understand without the need for deep domain expertise. Our work reveals capability gaps that are not evident in existing benchmarks: OpenAI o1 significantly outperforms other reasoning models on our benchmark, despite being on par with other models when tested on benchmarks that test specialized knowledge. Furthermore, our analysis of reasoning outputs uncovers new kinds of failures. DeepSeek R1, for instance, often concedes with "I give up" before providing an answer that it knows is wrong. R1 can also be remarkably "uncertain" in its output and in rare cases, it does not "finish thinking," which suggests the need for techniques to ``wrap up'' before the context window limit is reached. We also quantify the effectiveness of reasoning longer to identify the point beyond which more reasoning is unlikely to improve accuracy on our benchmark. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_01584 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | ReasoningWeekly: A General Knowledge and Verbal Reasoning Challenge for Large Language Models Wu, Zixuan Lucchetti, Francesca Boruch-Gruszecki, Aleksander Zhao, Jingmiao Anderson, Carolyn Jane Biswas, Joydeep Cassano, Federico Guha, Arjun Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Existing benchmarks for frontier models often test specialized, "PhD-level" knowledge that is difficult for non-experts to grasp. In contrast, we present a benchmark with 613 problems based on the NPR Sunday Puzzle Challenge that requires only general knowledge. Our benchmark is challenging for both humans and models; however correct solutions are easy to verify, and models' mistakes are easy to spot. As LLMs are more widely deployed in society, we believe it is useful to develop benchmarks for frontier models that humans can understand without the need for deep domain expertise. Our work reveals capability gaps that are not evident in existing benchmarks: OpenAI o1 significantly outperforms other reasoning models on our benchmark, despite being on par with other models when tested on benchmarks that test specialized knowledge. Furthermore, our analysis of reasoning outputs uncovers new kinds of failures. DeepSeek R1, for instance, often concedes with "I give up" before providing an answer that it knows is wrong. R1 can also be remarkably "uncertain" in its output and in rare cases, it does not "finish thinking," which suggests the need for techniques to ``wrap up'' before the context window limit is reached. We also quantify the effectiveness of reasoning longer to identify the point beyond which more reasoning is unlikely to improve accuracy on our benchmark. |
| title | ReasoningWeekly: A General Knowledge and Verbal Reasoning Challenge for Large Language Models |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01584 |