Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02963 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917913612517376 |
|---|---|
| author | Weinzierl, Sven Cora, Carl |
| author_facet | Weinzierl, Sven Cora, Carl |
| contents | We present machine-learning-based approaches for determining the \emph{degree} of inconsistency -- which is a numerical value -- for propositional logic knowledge bases. Specifically, we present regression- and neural-based models that learn to predict the values that the inconsistency measures $\incmi$ and $\incat$ would assign to propositional logic knowledge bases. Our main motivation is that computing these values conventionally can be hard complexity-wise. As an important addition, we use specific postulates, that is, properties, of the underlying inconsistency measures to infer symbolic rules, which we combine with the learning-based models in the form of constraints. We perform various experiments and show that a) predicting the degree values is feasible in many situations, and b) including the symbolic constraints deduced from the rationality postulates increases the prediction quality. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_02963 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | (Neural-Symbolic) Machine Learning for Inconsistency Measurement Weinzierl, Sven Cora, Carl Artificial Intelligence We present machine-learning-based approaches for determining the \emph{degree} of inconsistency -- which is a numerical value -- for propositional logic knowledge bases. Specifically, we present regression- and neural-based models that learn to predict the values that the inconsistency measures $\incmi$ and $\incat$ would assign to propositional logic knowledge bases. Our main motivation is that computing these values conventionally can be hard complexity-wise. As an important addition, we use specific postulates, that is, properties, of the underlying inconsistency measures to infer symbolic rules, which we combine with the learning-based models in the form of constraints. We perform various experiments and show that a) predicting the degree values is feasible in many situations, and b) including the symbolic constraints deduced from the rationality postulates increases the prediction quality. |
| title | (Neural-Symbolic) Machine Learning for Inconsistency Measurement |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02963 |