Measuring SES-related traits relating to technology usage: Two validated surveys
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866917916180480000 |
|---|---|
| author | Chikezie, Chimdi Chenpaiseng, Pannapat Agarwal, Puja Afroz, Sadia Madhwani, Bhavika Choudhuri, Rudrajit Anderson, Andrew Velhal, Prisha Morreale, Patricia Bogart, Christopher Sarma, Anita Burnett, Margaret |
| author_facet | Chikezie, Chimdi Chenpaiseng, Pannapat Agarwal, Puja Afroz, Sadia Madhwani, Bhavika Choudhuri, Rudrajit Anderson, Andrew Velhal, Prisha Morreale, Patricia Bogart, Christopher Sarma, Anita Burnett, Margaret |
| contents | Software producers are now recognizing the importance of improving their products' suitability for diverse populations, but little attention has been given to measurements to shed light on products' suitability to individuals below the median socioeconomic status (SES) -- who, by definition, make up half the population. To enable software practitioners to attend to both lower- and higher-SES individuals, this paper provides two new surveys that together facilitate measuring how well a software product serves socioeconomically diverse populations. The first survey (SES-Subjective) is who-oriented: it measures who their potential or current users are in terms of their subjective SES (perceptions of their SES). The second survey (SES-Facets) is why-oriented: it collects individuals' values for an evidence-based set of facet values (individual traits) that (1) statistically differ by SES and (2) affect how an individual works and problem-solves with software products. Our empirical validations with deployments at University A and University B (464 and 522 responses, respectively) showed that both surveys are reliable. Further, our results statistically agree with both ground truth data on respondents' socioeconomic statuses and with predictions from foundational literature. Finally, we explain how the pair of surveys is uniquely actionable by software practitioners, such as in requirements gathering, debugging, quality assurance activities, maintenance activities, and fulfilling legal reporting requirements such as those being drafted by various governments for AI-powered software. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_04710 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Measuring SES-related traits relating to technology usage: Two validated surveys Chikezie, Chimdi Chenpaiseng, Pannapat Agarwal, Puja Afroz, Sadia Madhwani, Bhavika Choudhuri, Rudrajit Anderson, Andrew Velhal, Prisha Morreale, Patricia Bogart, Christopher Sarma, Anita Burnett, Margaret Human-Computer Interaction Software Engineering Software producers are now recognizing the importance of improving their products' suitability for diverse populations, but little attention has been given to measurements to shed light on products' suitability to individuals below the median socioeconomic status (SES) -- who, by definition, make up half the population. To enable software practitioners to attend to both lower- and higher-SES individuals, this paper provides two new surveys that together facilitate measuring how well a software product serves socioeconomically diverse populations. The first survey (SES-Subjective) is who-oriented: it measures who their potential or current users are in terms of their subjective SES (perceptions of their SES). The second survey (SES-Facets) is why-oriented: it collects individuals' values for an evidence-based set of facet values (individual traits) that (1) statistically differ by SES and (2) affect how an individual works and problem-solves with software products. Our empirical validations with deployments at University A and University B (464 and 522 responses, respectively) showed that both surveys are reliable. Further, our results statistically agree with both ground truth data on respondents' socioeconomic statuses and with predictions from foundational literature. Finally, we explain how the pair of surveys is uniquely actionable by software practitioners, such as in requirements gathering, debugging, quality assurance activities, maintenance activities, and fulfilling legal reporting requirements such as those being drafted by various governments for AI-powered software. |
| title | Measuring SES-related traits relating to technology usage: Two validated surveys |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04710 |