Copertina

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Bouraffa, Abir, Pham, Yen Dieu, Maalej, Walid
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2025
Soggetti:	Software Engineering
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

Not One to Rule Them All: Mining Meaningful Code Review Orders From GitHub
di: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Explaining Explanation: An Empirical Study on Explanation in Code Reviews
di: Widyasari, Ratnadira, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

On Fun for Teaching Large Programming Courses
di: Maalej, Walid
Pubblicazione: (2026)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
di: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
di: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
di: Pham, Dung, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
di: Popoola, Saheed
Pubblicazione: (2024)

LikeThis! Empowering App Users to Submit UI Improvement Suggestions Instead of Complaints
di: Wei, Jialiang, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
di: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
di: Jo, Young, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Can Developers Prompt? A Controlled Experiment for Code Documentation Generation
di: Kruse, Hans-Alexander, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
di: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Model Cards Revisited: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice for Ethical AI Requirements
di: Puhlfürß, Tim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

An Exploratory Study of Documentation Strategies for Product Features in Popular GitHub Projects
di: Puhlfürß, Tim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Mining Issue Trackers: Concepts and Techniques
di: Montgomery, Lloyd, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Deal With Software Energy Concerns? A Pull Request-Based Study
di: Mitul, Tanjum Motin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Address Performance Optimizations? A BERTopic-Based Analysis of Pull Requests
di: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
di: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
di: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
di: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback
di: Kumar, Deepak
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
di: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Early-Stage Prediction of Review Effort in AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Minh, Dao Sy Duy, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Does GenAI Make Usability Testing Obsolete?
di: Pourasad, Ali Ebrahimi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
di: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
di: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Multilingual Crowd-Based Requirements Engineering Using Large Language Models
di: Pilone, Arthur, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Smells Depend on the Context: An Interview Study of Issue Tracking Problems and Smells in Practice
di: Montgomery, Lloyd, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
di: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
di: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
di: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
di: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
di: Amore, Teal, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
di: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

How Do OSS Developers Reuse Architectural Solutions from Q&A Sites: An Empirical Study
di: de Dieu, Musengamana Jean, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

An Empirical Study on Developers Shared Conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests and Issues
di: Hao, Huizi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)