Model Predictive and Reinforcement Learning Methods for Active Flow Control of an Airfoil with Dual-point Excitation of Plasma Actuators

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghaemi, AmirHossein, Ebrahimi, Abbas, Hajipour, Majid, Shobeiry, Seyyed Mohammad Mahdy, Lipaei, Arash Fath
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866912538529103872
author Ghaemi, AmirHossein
Ebrahimi, Abbas
Hajipour, Majid
Shobeiry, Seyyed Mohammad Mahdy
Lipaei, Arash Fath
author_facet Ghaemi, AmirHossein
Ebrahimi, Abbas
Hajipour, Majid
Shobeiry, Seyyed Mohammad Mahdy
Lipaei, Arash Fath
contents This study investigates the effectiveness of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for active flow control over a NACA 4412 airfoil near static stall at Reynolds number 4*10^5. By systematically evaluating these strategies, the research addresses a critical gap in optimizing excitation frequency and improving response time in flow control. The work contributes to understanding RL adaptability and performance versus MPC in aerodynamic flow separation control. Numerical simulations of the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations with the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model are used. Dielectric Barrier Discharge plasma actuators in dual-point excitation mode control flow separation. The study evaluates adaptive MPC, temporal difference RL (TDRL), and deep Q-learning (DQL) for optimizing excitation frequency and expediting stabilization. An integrated signal processing DQL approach is also examined. Adaptive MPC achieved Cl = 1.60 at 110 Hz but struggled near physical limits. RL optimized excitation frequencies, reaching Cl = 1.62 in under 2.5 s at 100 or 200 Hz. The study presents a novel RL - MPC comparison for active flow control with DBD actuators, contrasting with prior work focusing on MPC or RL alone. Using an online learning framework, RL methods dynamically adapt to real-time conditions. Evaluating adaptive MPC and RL together in this setup yields new insights into comparative performance in dynamic environments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_05577
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Model Predictive and Reinforcement Learning Methods for Active Flow Control of an Airfoil with Dual-point Excitation of Plasma Actuators
Ghaemi, AmirHossein
Ebrahimi, Abbas
Hajipour, Majid
Shobeiry, Seyyed Mohammad Mahdy
Lipaei, Arash Fath
Fluid Dynamics
This study investigates the effectiveness of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for active flow control over a NACA 4412 airfoil near static stall at Reynolds number 4*10^5. By systematically evaluating these strategies, the research addresses a critical gap in optimizing excitation frequency and improving response time in flow control. The work contributes to understanding RL adaptability and performance versus MPC in aerodynamic flow separation control. Numerical simulations of the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations with the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model are used. Dielectric Barrier Discharge plasma actuators in dual-point excitation mode control flow separation. The study evaluates adaptive MPC, temporal difference RL (TDRL), and deep Q-learning (DQL) for optimizing excitation frequency and expediting stabilization. An integrated signal processing DQL approach is also examined. Adaptive MPC achieved Cl = 1.60 at 110 Hz but struggled near physical limits. RL optimized excitation frequencies, reaching Cl = 1.62 in under 2.5 s at 100 or 200 Hz. The study presents a novel RL - MPC comparison for active flow control with DBD actuators, contrasting with prior work focusing on MPC or RL alone. Using an online learning framework, RL methods dynamically adapt to real-time conditions. Evaluating adaptive MPC and RL together in this setup yields new insights into comparative performance in dynamic environments.
title Model Predictive and Reinforcement Learning Methods for Active Flow Control of an Airfoil with Dual-point Excitation of Plasma Actuators
topic Fluid Dynamics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05577