Falsification of Unconfoundedness by Testing Independence of Causal Mechanisms

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karlsson, Rickard K. A., Krijthe, Jesse H.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912407690936320
author Karlsson, Rickard K. A.
Krijthe, Jesse H.
author_facet Karlsson, Rickard K. A.
Krijthe, Jesse H.
contents A major challenge in estimating treatment effects in observational studies is the reliance on untestable conditions such as the assumption of no unmeasured confounding. In this work, we propose an algorithm that can falsify the assumption of no unmeasured confounding in a setting with observational data from multiple heterogeneous sources, which we refer to as environments. Our proposed falsification strategy leverages a key observation that unmeasured confounding can cause observed causal mechanisms to appear dependent. Building on this observation, we develop a novel two-stage procedure that detects these dependencies with high statistical power while controlling false positives. The algorithm does not require access to randomized data and, in contrast to other falsification approaches, functions even under transportability violations when the environment has a direct effect on the outcome of interest. To showcase the practical relevance of our approach, we show that our method is able to efficiently detect confounding on both simulated and semi-synthetic data.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_06231
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Falsification of Unconfoundedness by Testing Independence of Causal Mechanisms
Karlsson, Rickard K. A.
Krijthe, Jesse H.
Methodology
Machine Learning
62F03 (Primary) 68T01 (Secondary)
A major challenge in estimating treatment effects in observational studies is the reliance on untestable conditions such as the assumption of no unmeasured confounding. In this work, we propose an algorithm that can falsify the assumption of no unmeasured confounding in a setting with observational data from multiple heterogeneous sources, which we refer to as environments. Our proposed falsification strategy leverages a key observation that unmeasured confounding can cause observed causal mechanisms to appear dependent. Building on this observation, we develop a novel two-stage procedure that detects these dependencies with high statistical power while controlling false positives. The algorithm does not require access to randomized data and, in contrast to other falsification approaches, functions even under transportability violations when the environment has a direct effect on the outcome of interest. To showcase the practical relevance of our approach, we show that our method is able to efficiently detect confounding on both simulated and semi-synthetic data.
title Falsification of Unconfoundedness by Testing Independence of Causal Mechanisms
topic Methodology
Machine Learning
62F03 (Primary) 68T01 (Secondary)
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06231