Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayad, Célia Wafa, Bonnier, Thomas, Bosch, Benjamin, Parbhoo, Sonali, Read, Jesse
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07153
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916608171048960
author Ayad, Célia Wafa
Bonnier, Thomas
Bosch, Benjamin
Parbhoo, Sonali
Read, Jesse
author_facet Ayad, Célia Wafa
Bonnier, Thomas
Bosch, Benjamin
Parbhoo, Sonali
Read, Jesse
contents In order to ensure the reliability of the explanations of machine learning models, it is crucial to establish their advantages and limits and in which case each of these methods outperform. However, the current understanding of when and how each method of explanation can be used is insufficient. To fill this gap, we perform a comprehensive empirical evaluation by synthesizing multiple datasets with the desired properties. Our main objective is to assess the quality of feature importance estimates provided by local explanation methods, which are used to explain predictions made by decision tree-based models. By analyzing the results obtained from synthetic datasets as well as publicly available binary classification datasets, we observe notable disparities in the magnitude and sign of the feature importance estimates generated by these methods. Moreover, we find that these estimates are sensitive to specific properties present in the data. Although some model hyper-parameters do not significantly influence feature importance assignment, it is important to recognize that each method of explanation has limitations in specific contexts. Our assessment highlights these limitations and provides valuable insight into the suitability and reliability of different explanatory methods in various scenarios.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_07153
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Feature Importance Depends on Properties of the Data: Towards Choosing the Correct Explanations for Your Data and Decision Trees based Models
Ayad, Célia Wafa
Bonnier, Thomas
Bosch, Benjamin
Parbhoo, Sonali
Read, Jesse
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
In order to ensure the reliability of the explanations of machine learning models, it is crucial to establish their advantages and limits and in which case each of these methods outperform. However, the current understanding of when and how each method of explanation can be used is insufficient. To fill this gap, we perform a comprehensive empirical evaluation by synthesizing multiple datasets with the desired properties. Our main objective is to assess the quality of feature importance estimates provided by local explanation methods, which are used to explain predictions made by decision tree-based models. By analyzing the results obtained from synthetic datasets as well as publicly available binary classification datasets, we observe notable disparities in the magnitude and sign of the feature importance estimates generated by these methods. Moreover, we find that these estimates are sensitive to specific properties present in the data. Although some model hyper-parameters do not significantly influence feature importance assignment, it is important to recognize that each method of explanation has limitations in specific contexts. Our assessment highlights these limitations and provides valuable insight into the suitability and reliability of different explanatory methods in various scenarios.
title Feature Importance Depends on Properties of the Data: Towards Choosing the Correct Explanations for Your Data and Decision Trees based Models
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07153