When Incentives Backfire, Data Stops Being Human

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Santy, Sebastin, Bhattacharya, Prasanta, Ribeiro, Manoel Horta, Allen, Kelsey, Oh, Sewoong
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915332494458880
author Santy, Sebastin
Bhattacharya, Prasanta
Ribeiro, Manoel Horta
Allen, Kelsey
Oh, Sewoong
author_facet Santy, Sebastin
Bhattacharya, Prasanta
Ribeiro, Manoel Horta
Allen, Kelsey
Oh, Sewoong
contents Progress in AI has relied on human-generated data, from annotator marketplaces to the wider Internet. However, the widespread use of large language models now threatens the quality and integrity of human-generated data on these very platforms. We argue that this issue goes beyond the immediate challenge of filtering AI-generated content -- it reveals deeper flaws in how data collection systems are designed. Existing systems often prioritize speed, scale, and efficiency at the cost of intrinsic human motivation, leading to declining engagement and data quality. We propose that rethinking data collection systems to align with contributors' intrinsic motivations -- rather than relying solely on external incentives -- can help sustain high-quality data sourcing at scale while maintaining contributor trust and long-term participation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_07732
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle When Incentives Backfire, Data Stops Being Human
Santy, Sebastin
Bhattacharya, Prasanta
Ribeiro, Manoel Horta
Allen, Kelsey
Oh, Sewoong
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Human-Computer Interaction
Machine Learning
Progress in AI has relied on human-generated data, from annotator marketplaces to the wider Internet. However, the widespread use of large language models now threatens the quality and integrity of human-generated data on these very platforms. We argue that this issue goes beyond the immediate challenge of filtering AI-generated content -- it reveals deeper flaws in how data collection systems are designed. Existing systems often prioritize speed, scale, and efficiency at the cost of intrinsic human motivation, leading to declining engagement and data quality. We propose that rethinking data collection systems to align with contributors' intrinsic motivations -- rather than relying solely on external incentives -- can help sustain high-quality data sourcing at scale while maintaining contributor trust and long-term participation.
title When Incentives Backfire, Data Stops Being Human
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Human-Computer Interaction
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07732