Revisiting 3D LLM Benchmarks: Are We Really Testing 3D Capabilities?

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin, Jiahe, He, Yanheng, Yang, Mingyan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913880129667072
author Jin, Jiahe
He, Yanheng
Yang, Mingyan
author_facet Jin, Jiahe
He, Yanheng
Yang, Mingyan
contents In this work, we identify the "2D-Cheating" problem in 3D LLM evaluation, where these tasks might be easily solved by VLMs with rendered images of point clouds, exposing ineffective evaluation of 3D LLMs' unique 3D capabilities. We test VLM performance across multiple 3D LLM benchmarks and, using this as a reference, propose principles for better assessing genuine 3D understanding. We also advocate explicitly separating 3D abilities from 1D or 2D aspects when evaluating 3D LLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/LLM-class-group/Revisiting-3D-LLM-Benchmarks
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_08503
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Revisiting 3D LLM Benchmarks: Are We Really Testing 3D Capabilities?
Jin, Jiahe
He, Yanheng
Yang, Mingyan
Artificial Intelligence
In this work, we identify the "2D-Cheating" problem in 3D LLM evaluation, where these tasks might be easily solved by VLMs with rendered images of point clouds, exposing ineffective evaluation of 3D LLMs' unique 3D capabilities. We test VLM performance across multiple 3D LLM benchmarks and, using this as a reference, propose principles for better assessing genuine 3D understanding. We also advocate explicitly separating 3D abilities from 1D or 2D aspects when evaluating 3D LLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/LLM-class-group/Revisiting-3D-LLM-Benchmarks
title Revisiting 3D LLM Benchmarks: Are We Really Testing 3D Capabilities?
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08503