Signed, Sealed,... Confused: Exploring the Understandability and Severity of Policy Documents

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soneji, Shikha, Panda, Sourav, Neve, Sameer, Dodge, Jonathan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929713041113088
author Soneji, Shikha
Panda, Sourav
Neve, Sameer
Dodge, Jonathan
author_facet Soneji, Shikha
Panda, Sourav
Neve, Sameer
Dodge, Jonathan
contents In general, Terms of Service (ToS) and other policy documents are verbose and full of legal jargon, which poses challenges for users to understand. To improve user accessibility and transparency, the "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" (ToS;DR) project condenses intricate legal terminology into summaries and overall grades for the website's policy documents. Nevertheless, uncertainties remain about whether users could truly grasp the implications of simplified presentations. We conducted an online survey to assess the perceived understandability and severity of randomly chosen cases from the ToS;DR taxonomy. Preliminary results indicate that, although most users report understanding the cases, they find a bias towards service providers in about two-thirds of the cases. The findings of our study emphasize the necessity of prioritizing user-centric policy formulation. This study has the potential to reveal the extent of information imbalance in digital services and promote more well-informed user consent.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_08743
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Signed, Sealed,... Confused: Exploring the Understandability and Severity of Policy Documents
Soneji, Shikha
Panda, Sourav
Neve, Sameer
Dodge, Jonathan
Human-Computer Interaction
In general, Terms of Service (ToS) and other policy documents are verbose and full of legal jargon, which poses challenges for users to understand. To improve user accessibility and transparency, the "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" (ToS;DR) project condenses intricate legal terminology into summaries and overall grades for the website's policy documents. Nevertheless, uncertainties remain about whether users could truly grasp the implications of simplified presentations. We conducted an online survey to assess the perceived understandability and severity of randomly chosen cases from the ToS;DR taxonomy. Preliminary results indicate that, although most users report understanding the cases, they find a bias towards service providers in about two-thirds of the cases. The findings of our study emphasize the necessity of prioritizing user-centric policy formulation. This study has the potential to reveal the extent of information imbalance in digital services and promote more well-informed user consent.
title Signed, Sealed,... Confused: Exploring the Understandability and Severity of Policy Documents
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08743