A Systematic Review on the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Sarıtaş, Karahan, Tezören, Kıvanç, Durmazkeser, Yavuz
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866909490516852736
author Sarıtaş, Karahan
Tezören, Kıvanç
Durmazkeser, Yavuz
author_facet Sarıtaş, Karahan
Tezören, Kıvanç
Durmazkeser, Yavuz
contents In recent years, evaluating the Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities of large language models (LLMs) has received significant attention within the research community. As the field rapidly evolves, navigating the diverse approaches and methodologies has become increasingly complex. This systematic review synthesizes current efforts to assess LLMs' ability to perform ToM tasks, an essential aspect of human cognition involving the attribution of mental states to oneself and others. Despite notable advancements, the proficiency of LLMs in ToM remains a contentious issue. By categorizing benchmarks and tasks through a taxonomy rooted in cognitive science, this review critically examines evaluation techniques, prompting strategies, and the inherent limitations of LLMs in replicating human-like mental state reasoning. A recurring theme in the literature reveals that while LLMs demonstrate emerging competence in ToM tasks, significant gaps persist in their emulation of human cognitive abilities.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_08796
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A Systematic Review on the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks
Sarıtaş, Karahan
Tezören, Kıvanç
Durmazkeser, Yavuz
Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
In recent years, evaluating the Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities of large language models (LLMs) has received significant attention within the research community. As the field rapidly evolves, navigating the diverse approaches and methodologies has become increasingly complex. This systematic review synthesizes current efforts to assess LLMs' ability to perform ToM tasks, an essential aspect of human cognition involving the attribution of mental states to oneself and others. Despite notable advancements, the proficiency of LLMs in ToM remains a contentious issue. By categorizing benchmarks and tasks through a taxonomy rooted in cognitive science, this review critically examines evaluation techniques, prompting strategies, and the inherent limitations of LLMs in replicating human-like mental state reasoning. A recurring theme in the literature reveals that while LLMs demonstrate emerging competence in ToM tasks, significant gaps persist in their emulation of human cognitive abilities.
title A Systematic Review on the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks
topic Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08796