Automated Hypothesis Validation with Agentic Sequential Falsifications

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Kexin, Jin, Ying, Li, Ryan, Li, Michael Y., Candès, Emmanuel, Leskovec, Jure
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910827219517440
author Huang, Kexin
Jin, Ying
Li, Ryan
Li, Michael Y.
Candès, Emmanuel
Leskovec, Jure
author_facet Huang, Kexin
Jin, Ying
Li, Ryan
Li, Michael Y.
Candès, Emmanuel
Leskovec, Jure
contents Hypotheses are central to information acquisition, decision-making, and discovery. However, many real-world hypotheses are abstract, high-level statements that are difficult to validate directly. This challenge is further intensified by the rise of hypothesis generation from Large Language Models (LLMs), which are prone to hallucination and produce hypotheses in volumes that make manual validation impractical. Here we propose Popper, an agentic framework for rigorous automated validation of free-form hypotheses. Guided by Karl Popper's principle of falsification, Popper validates a hypothesis using LLM agents that design and execute falsification experiments targeting its measurable implications. A novel sequential testing framework ensures strict Type-I error control while actively gathering evidence from diverse observations, whether drawn from existing data or newly conducted procedures. We demonstrate Popper on six domains including biology, economics, and sociology. Popper delivers robust error control, high power, and scalability. Furthermore, compared to human scientists, Popper achieved comparable performance in validating complex biological hypotheses while reducing time by 10 folds, providing a scalable, rigorous solution for hypothesis validation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_09858
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Automated Hypothesis Validation with Agentic Sequential Falsifications
Huang, Kexin
Jin, Ying
Li, Ryan
Li, Michael Y.
Candès, Emmanuel
Leskovec, Jure
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Quantitative Methods
Hypotheses are central to information acquisition, decision-making, and discovery. However, many real-world hypotheses are abstract, high-level statements that are difficult to validate directly. This challenge is further intensified by the rise of hypothesis generation from Large Language Models (LLMs), which are prone to hallucination and produce hypotheses in volumes that make manual validation impractical. Here we propose Popper, an agentic framework for rigorous automated validation of free-form hypotheses. Guided by Karl Popper's principle of falsification, Popper validates a hypothesis using LLM agents that design and execute falsification experiments targeting its measurable implications. A novel sequential testing framework ensures strict Type-I error control while actively gathering evidence from diverse observations, whether drawn from existing data or newly conducted procedures. We demonstrate Popper on six domains including biology, economics, and sociology. Popper delivers robust error control, high power, and scalability. Furthermore, compared to human scientists, Popper achieved comparable performance in validating complex biological hypotheses while reducing time by 10 folds, providing a scalable, rigorous solution for hypothesis validation.
title Automated Hypothesis Validation with Agentic Sequential Falsifications
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Quantitative Methods
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09858