Lost in the Passage: Passage-level In-context Learning Does Not Necessarily Need a "Passage"
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916781588742144 |
|---|---|
| author | Sun, Hao Tang, Chenming Li, Gengyang Wu, Yunfang |
| author_facet | Sun, Hao Tang, Chenming Li, Gengyang Wu, Yunfang |
| contents | By simply incorporating demonstrations into the context, in-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to yield awesome performance on many tasks. In this study, we focus on passage-level long-context ICL for generation tasks and find that LLMs cannot learn the intrinsic relationship between the demonstration passage and the generation output. We conduct experiments with different LLMs on two typical generation tasks including single-document question answering and distractor generation, demonstrating that even a completely meaningless demonstration passage with 1/4 length achieves much better performance than the original full passage. Analysis via attention and information flow reveals that LLMs pay little attention to passages compared to other components in the prompt and little information flows from the passage to other parts of the demonstration, which further confirms our finding. Additionally, experiments on context compression indicate that compression approaches proven effective on other long-context tasks are not suitable for passage-level ICL, since simply using shorter meaningless demonstration passages already achieves competitive performance. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_10634 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Lost in the Passage: Passage-level In-context Learning Does Not Necessarily Need a "Passage" Sun, Hao Tang, Chenming Li, Gengyang Wu, Yunfang Computation and Language By simply incorporating demonstrations into the context, in-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to yield awesome performance on many tasks. In this study, we focus on passage-level long-context ICL for generation tasks and find that LLMs cannot learn the intrinsic relationship between the demonstration passage and the generation output. We conduct experiments with different LLMs on two typical generation tasks including single-document question answering and distractor generation, demonstrating that even a completely meaningless demonstration passage with 1/4 length achieves much better performance than the original full passage. Analysis via attention and information flow reveals that LLMs pay little attention to passages compared to other components in the prompt and little information flows from the passage to other parts of the demonstration, which further confirms our finding. Additionally, experiments on context compression indicate that compression approaches proven effective on other long-context tasks are not suitable for passage-level ICL, since simply using shorter meaningless demonstration passages already achieves competitive performance. |
| title | Lost in the Passage: Passage-level In-context Learning Does Not Necessarily Need a "Passage" |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10634 |