Chronus: Understanding and Securing the Cutting-Edge Industry Solutions to DRAM Read Disturbance
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866912575176835072 |
|---|---|
| author | Canpolat, Oğuzhan Yağlıkçı, A. Giray Oliveira, Geraldo F. Olgun, Ataberk Bostancı, Nisa Yüksel, İsmail Emir Luo, Haocong Ergin, Oğuz Mutlu, Onur |
| author_facet | Canpolat, Oğuzhan Yağlıkçı, A. Giray Oliveira, Geraldo F. Olgun, Ataberk Bostancı, Nisa Yüksel, İsmail Emir Luo, Haocong Ergin, Oğuz Mutlu, Onur |
| contents | We 1) present the first rigorous security, performance, energy, and cost analyses of the state-of-the-art on-DRAM-die read disturbance mitigation method, Per Row Activation Counting (PRAC) and 2) propose Chronus, a new mechanism that addresses PRAC's two major weaknesses. Our analysis shows that PRAC's system performance overhead on benign applications is non-negligible for modern DRAM chips and prohibitively large for future DRAM chips that are more vulnerable to read disturbance. We identify two weaknesses of PRAC that cause these overheads. First, PRAC increases critical DRAM access latency parameters due to the additional time required to increment activation counters. Second, PRAC performs a constant number of preventive refreshes at a time, making it vulnerable to an adversarial access pattern, known as the wave attack, and consequently requiring it to be configured for significantly smaller activation thresholds. To address PRAC's two weaknesses, we propose a new on-DRAM-die RowHammer mitigation mechanism, Chronus. Chronus 1) updates row activation counters concurrently while serving accesses by separating counters from the data and 2) prevents the wave attack by dynamically controlling the number of preventive refreshes performed. Our performance analysis shows that Chronus's system performance overhead is near-zero for modern DRAM chips and very low for future DRAM chips. Chronus outperforms three variants of PRAC and three other state-of-the-art read disturbance solutions. We discuss Chronus's and PRAC's implications for future systems and foreshadow future research directions. To aid future research, we open-source our Chronus implementation at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/Chronus. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_12650 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Chronus: Understanding and Securing the Cutting-Edge Industry Solutions to DRAM Read Disturbance Canpolat, Oğuzhan Yağlıkçı, A. Giray Oliveira, Geraldo F. Olgun, Ataberk Bostancı, Nisa Yüksel, İsmail Emir Luo, Haocong Ergin, Oğuz Mutlu, Onur Cryptography and Security Hardware Architecture We 1) present the first rigorous security, performance, energy, and cost analyses of the state-of-the-art on-DRAM-die read disturbance mitigation method, Per Row Activation Counting (PRAC) and 2) propose Chronus, a new mechanism that addresses PRAC's two major weaknesses. Our analysis shows that PRAC's system performance overhead on benign applications is non-negligible for modern DRAM chips and prohibitively large for future DRAM chips that are more vulnerable to read disturbance. We identify two weaknesses of PRAC that cause these overheads. First, PRAC increases critical DRAM access latency parameters due to the additional time required to increment activation counters. Second, PRAC performs a constant number of preventive refreshes at a time, making it vulnerable to an adversarial access pattern, known as the wave attack, and consequently requiring it to be configured for significantly smaller activation thresholds. To address PRAC's two weaknesses, we propose a new on-DRAM-die RowHammer mitigation mechanism, Chronus. Chronus 1) updates row activation counters concurrently while serving accesses by separating counters from the data and 2) prevents the wave attack by dynamically controlling the number of preventive refreshes performed. Our performance analysis shows that Chronus's system performance overhead is near-zero for modern DRAM chips and very low for future DRAM chips. Chronus outperforms three variants of PRAC and three other state-of-the-art read disturbance solutions. We discuss Chronus's and PRAC's implications for future systems and foreshadow future research directions. To aid future research, we open-source our Chronus implementation at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/Chronus. |
| title | Chronus: Understanding and Securing the Cutting-Edge Industry Solutions to DRAM Read Disturbance |
| topic | Cryptography and Security Hardware Architecture |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12650 |