KL Penalty Control via Perturbation for Direct Preference Optimization
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909868718292992 |
|---|---|
| author | Lee, Sangkyu Han, Janghoon Song, Hosung Choi, Stanley Jungkyu Lee, Honglak Yu, Youngjae |
| author_facet | Lee, Sangkyu Han, Janghoon Song, Hosung Choi, Stanley Jungkyu Lee, Honglak Yu, Youngjae |
| contents | Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) demonstrates the advantage of aligning a large language model with human preference using only an offline dataset. However, DPO has the limitation that the KL penalty, which prevents excessive deviation from the reference model, is static throughout the training process. Several methods claim to change this static KL penalty of DPO into a dynamic one, but no approach can adaptively assign different KL penalties for each preference pair. In this paper, we propose $\varepsilon$-Direct Preference Optimization ($\varepsilon$-DPO), which allows adaptive control of the KL penalty strength $β$ for each preference pair. Specifically, $\varepsilon$-DPO adaptively controls $β$ for each preference pair based on the monotonicity of logits as a preference model under the perturbation of $β$ during training. This is equivalent to adjusting the KL penalty by checking whether the change in training-time temperature can lead to better preference confidence as preference models by simply reusing the logit of the current policy and the reference policy. Experimental results show that the simple criterion of $\varepsilon$-DPO for KL penalty relaxation significantly improves DPO compared to most existing direct alignment algorithms on general chatbot benchmarks and reveal that this KL penalty control criterion can reflect confusion as a preference model and provide an efficient KL trade-off, highlighting the significance of instance-level adaptive KL penalty control in DPO. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_13177 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | KL Penalty Control via Perturbation for Direct Preference Optimization Lee, Sangkyu Han, Janghoon Song, Hosung Choi, Stanley Jungkyu Lee, Honglak Yu, Youngjae Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) demonstrates the advantage of aligning a large language model with human preference using only an offline dataset. However, DPO has the limitation that the KL penalty, which prevents excessive deviation from the reference model, is static throughout the training process. Several methods claim to change this static KL penalty of DPO into a dynamic one, but no approach can adaptively assign different KL penalties for each preference pair. In this paper, we propose $\varepsilon$-Direct Preference Optimization ($\varepsilon$-DPO), which allows adaptive control of the KL penalty strength $β$ for each preference pair. Specifically, $\varepsilon$-DPO adaptively controls $β$ for each preference pair based on the monotonicity of logits as a preference model under the perturbation of $β$ during training. This is equivalent to adjusting the KL penalty by checking whether the change in training-time temperature can lead to better preference confidence as preference models by simply reusing the logit of the current policy and the reference policy. Experimental results show that the simple criterion of $\varepsilon$-DPO for KL penalty relaxation significantly improves DPO compared to most existing direct alignment algorithms on general chatbot benchmarks and reveal that this KL penalty control criterion can reflect confusion as a preference model and provide an efficient KL trade-off, highlighting the significance of instance-level adaptive KL penalty control in DPO. |
| title | KL Penalty Control via Perturbation for Direct Preference Optimization |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13177 |