Adjust for Trust: Mitigating Trust-Induced Inappropriate Reliance on AI Assistance

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srinivasan, Tejas, Thomason, Jesse
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911397911199744
author Srinivasan, Tejas
Thomason, Jesse
author_facet Srinivasan, Tejas
Thomason, Jesse
contents Trust biases how users rely on AI recommendations in AI-assisted decision-making tasks, with low and high levels of trust resulting in increased under- and over-reliance, respectively. We propose that AI assistants should adapt their behavior through trust-adaptive interventions to mitigate such inappropriate reliance. For instance, when user trust is low, providing an explanation can elicit more careful consideration of the assistant's advice by the user. In two decision-making scenarios -- laypeople answering science questions and doctors making medical diagnoses -- we find that providing supporting and counter-explanations during moments of low and high trust, respectively, yields up to 38% reduction in inappropriate reliance and 20% improvement in decision accuracy. We are similarly able to reduce over-reliance by adaptively inserting forced pauses to promote deliberation. Our results highlight how AI adaptation to user trust facilitates appropriate reliance, presenting exciting avenues for improving human-AI collaboration.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_13321
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Adjust for Trust: Mitigating Trust-Induced Inappropriate Reliance on AI Assistance
Srinivasan, Tejas
Thomason, Jesse
Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Trust biases how users rely on AI recommendations in AI-assisted decision-making tasks, with low and high levels of trust resulting in increased under- and over-reliance, respectively. We propose that AI assistants should adapt their behavior through trust-adaptive interventions to mitigate such inappropriate reliance. For instance, when user trust is low, providing an explanation can elicit more careful consideration of the assistant's advice by the user. In two decision-making scenarios -- laypeople answering science questions and doctors making medical diagnoses -- we find that providing supporting and counter-explanations during moments of low and high trust, respectively, yields up to 38% reduction in inappropriate reliance and 20% improvement in decision accuracy. We are similarly able to reduce over-reliance by adaptively inserting forced pauses to promote deliberation. Our results highlight how AI adaptation to user trust facilitates appropriate reliance, presenting exciting avenues for improving human-AI collaboration.
title Adjust for Trust: Mitigating Trust-Induced Inappropriate Reliance on AI Assistance
topic Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13321