Sufficiency of the counterfactual account of Lüders' rule to rule out ontological models of quantum mechanics
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866909894526894080 |
|---|---|
| author | Tezzin, Alisson Amaral, Bárbara Hance, Jonte R. |
| author_facet | Tezzin, Alisson Amaral, Bárbara Hance, Jonte R. |
| contents | Ontological models, as used in the generalised contextuality literature, play a central role in current research on quantum foundations, providing a framework for defining classicality, constructing classical analogues of key quantum phenomena, and examining the ontology of quantum states. In this work, we show that a counterfactual account of Lüders' rule -- which we argue is naturally implied by the mathematical structure of the rule itself -- renders such models inherently incompatible with the quantum formalism. This incompatibility arises because the counterfactual update requires ontological models to update their states according to conditional probability, which in turn which in turn renders predictions of sequential measurements order-independent. This implies that ontological models, even contextual ones, must either act differently to what we would expect given (this, typically implicitly-assumed account of) quantum state update rule, or cannot model quantum behaviour. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_15615 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Sufficiency of the counterfactual account of Lüders' rule to rule out ontological models of quantum mechanics Tezzin, Alisson Amaral, Bárbara Hance, Jonte R. Quantum Physics Mathematical Physics History and Philosophy of Physics Ontological models, as used in the generalised contextuality literature, play a central role in current research on quantum foundations, providing a framework for defining classicality, constructing classical analogues of key quantum phenomena, and examining the ontology of quantum states. In this work, we show that a counterfactual account of Lüders' rule -- which we argue is naturally implied by the mathematical structure of the rule itself -- renders such models inherently incompatible with the quantum formalism. This incompatibility arises because the counterfactual update requires ontological models to update their states according to conditional probability, which in turn which in turn renders predictions of sequential measurements order-independent. This implies that ontological models, even contextual ones, must either act differently to what we would expect given (this, typically implicitly-assumed account of) quantum state update rule, or cannot model quantum behaviour. |
| title | Sufficiency of the counterfactual account of Lüders' rule to rule out ontological models of quantum mechanics |
| topic | Quantum Physics Mathematical Physics History and Philosophy of Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15615 |