Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15859 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912486949650432 |
|---|---|
| author | Zeng, Yi Lu, Enmeng Guan, Xin Huangfu, Cunqing Ruan, Zizhe Younas, Ammar Sun, Kang Tang, Xuan Wang, Yuwei Suo, Hongjie Liang, Dongqi Han, Zhengqiang Bao, Aorigele Guo, Xiaoyang Wang, Jin Xie, Jiawei Liang, Yao |
| author_facet | Zeng, Yi Lu, Enmeng Guan, Xin Huangfu, Cunqing Ruan, Zizhe Younas, Ammar Sun, Kang Tang, Xuan Wang, Yuwei Suo, Hongjie Liang, Dongqi Han, Zhengqiang Bao, Aorigele Guo, Xiaoyang Wang, Jin Xie, Jiawei Liang, Yao |
| contents | The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is profoundly transforming human society and concurrently presenting a series of ethical, legal, and social issues. The effective governance of AI has become a crucial global concern. Since 2022, the extensive deployment of generative AI, particularly large language models, marked a new phase in AI governance. Continuous efforts are being made by the international community in actively addressing the novel challenges posed by these AI developments. As consensus on international governance continues to be established and put into action, the practical importance of conducting a global assessment of the state of AI governance is progressively coming to light. In this context, we initiated the development of the AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index). Adhering to the design principle, "the level of governance should match the level of development," the inaugural evaluation of the AGILE Index commences with an exploration of four foundational pillars: the development level of AI, the AI governance environment, the AI governance instruments, and the AI governance effectiveness. It covers 39 indicators across 18 dimensions to comprehensively assess the AI governance level of 14 representative countries globally. The index is utilized to delve into the status of AI governance to date in 14 countries for the first batch of evaluation. The aim is to depict the current state of AI governance in these countries through data scoring, assist them in identifying their governance stage and uncovering governance issues, and ultimately offer insights for the enhancement of their AI governance systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_15859 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) 2024 Zeng, Yi Lu, Enmeng Guan, Xin Huangfu, Cunqing Ruan, Zizhe Younas, Ammar Sun, Kang Tang, Xuan Wang, Yuwei Suo, Hongjie Liang, Dongqi Han, Zhengqiang Bao, Aorigele Guo, Xiaoyang Wang, Jin Xie, Jiawei Liang, Yao Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence 68T01 A.1 The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is profoundly transforming human society and concurrently presenting a series of ethical, legal, and social issues. The effective governance of AI has become a crucial global concern. Since 2022, the extensive deployment of generative AI, particularly large language models, marked a new phase in AI governance. Continuous efforts are being made by the international community in actively addressing the novel challenges posed by these AI developments. As consensus on international governance continues to be established and put into action, the practical importance of conducting a global assessment of the state of AI governance is progressively coming to light. In this context, we initiated the development of the AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index). Adhering to the design principle, "the level of governance should match the level of development," the inaugural evaluation of the AGILE Index commences with an exploration of four foundational pillars: the development level of AI, the AI governance environment, the AI governance instruments, and the AI governance effectiveness. It covers 39 indicators across 18 dimensions to comprehensively assess the AI governance level of 14 representative countries globally. The index is utilized to delve into the status of AI governance to date in 14 countries for the first batch of evaluation. The aim is to depict the current state of AI governance in these countries through data scoring, assist them in identifying their governance stage and uncovering governance issues, and ultimately offer insights for the enhancement of their AI governance systems. |
| title | AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) 2024 |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence 68T01 A.1 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15859 |