Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rudman, William, Golovanevsky, Michal, Bar, Amir, Palit, Vedant, LeCun, Yann, Eickhoff, Carsten, Singh, Ritambhara
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15969
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916915477217280
author Rudman, William
Golovanevsky, Michal
Bar, Amir
Palit, Vedant
LeCun, Yann
Eickhoff, Carsten
Singh, Ritambhara
author_facet Rudman, William
Golovanevsky, Michal
Bar, Amir
Palit, Vedant
LeCun, Yann
Eickhoff, Carsten
Singh, Ritambhara
contents Despite strong performance on vision-language tasks, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle with mathematical problem-solving, with both open-source and state-of-the-art models falling short of human performance on visual-math benchmarks. To systematically examine visual-mathematical reasoning in MLLMs, we (1) evaluate their understanding of geometric primitives, (2) test multi-step reasoning, and (3) explore a potential solution to improve visual reasoning capabilities. Our findings reveal fundamental shortcomings in shape recognition, with top models achieving under 50% accuracy in identifying regular polygons. We analyze these failures through the lens of dual-process theory and show that MLLMs rely on System 1 (intuitive, memorized associations) rather than System 2 (deliberate reasoning). Consequently, MLLMs fail to count the sides of both familiar and novel shapes, suggesting they have neither learned the concept of sides nor effectively process visual inputs. Finally, we propose Visually Cued Chain-of-Thought (VC-CoT) prompting, which enhances multi-step mathematical reasoning by explicitly referencing visual annotations in diagrams, boosting GPT-4o's accuracy on an irregular polygon side-counting task from 7% to 93%. Our findings suggest that System 2 reasoning in MLLMs remains an open problem, and visually-guided prompting is essential for successfully engaging visual reasoning. Code available at: https://github.com/rsinghlab/Shape-Blind.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_15969
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Forgotten Polygons: Multimodal Large Language Models are Shape-Blind
Rudman, William
Golovanevsky, Michal
Bar, Amir
Palit, Vedant
LeCun, Yann
Eickhoff, Carsten
Singh, Ritambhara
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Despite strong performance on vision-language tasks, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle with mathematical problem-solving, with both open-source and state-of-the-art models falling short of human performance on visual-math benchmarks. To systematically examine visual-mathematical reasoning in MLLMs, we (1) evaluate their understanding of geometric primitives, (2) test multi-step reasoning, and (3) explore a potential solution to improve visual reasoning capabilities. Our findings reveal fundamental shortcomings in shape recognition, with top models achieving under 50% accuracy in identifying regular polygons. We analyze these failures through the lens of dual-process theory and show that MLLMs rely on System 1 (intuitive, memorized associations) rather than System 2 (deliberate reasoning). Consequently, MLLMs fail to count the sides of both familiar and novel shapes, suggesting they have neither learned the concept of sides nor effectively process visual inputs. Finally, we propose Visually Cued Chain-of-Thought (VC-CoT) prompting, which enhances multi-step mathematical reasoning by explicitly referencing visual annotations in diagrams, boosting GPT-4o's accuracy on an irregular polygon side-counting task from 7% to 93%. Our findings suggest that System 2 reasoning in MLLMs remains an open problem, and visually-guided prompting is essential for successfully engaging visual reasoning. Code available at: https://github.com/rsinghlab/Shape-Blind.
title Forgotten Polygons: Multimodal Large Language Models are Shape-Blind
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15969