Breaking the Balance: Asymmetric Negative Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866916658701926400 |
|---|---|
| author | Zheng, Bang Quan |
| author_facet | Zheng, Bang Quan |
| contents | While voters from opposing parties have traditionally exhibited symmetric levels of hostility toward out-party candidates, our analysis of the 2016 and 2020 Nationscape data reveals a notable departure from this pattern. In 2016, negative voting was relatively balanced, with similar levels of hostility directed at Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. However, by 2020, asymmetric negative voting had emerged. As an incumbent seeking re-election amid a rapidly declining economy, the COVID-19 pandemic, and widespread uncertainty, Trump faced heightened negative perceptions fueled by dissatisfaction with his handling of the economy, race relations, the pandemic, and his leadership style. These factors galvanized younger, educated Democrats and Independents to vote against him in unprecedented numbers. In contrast, Republicans expressed less animosity toward Biden in 2020 than they had toward Clinton in 2016. This shift disrupted the balance in the typical pattern of symmetric negative voting. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_16081 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Breaking the Balance: Asymmetric Negative Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election Zheng, Bang Quan Applications While voters from opposing parties have traditionally exhibited symmetric levels of hostility toward out-party candidates, our analysis of the 2016 and 2020 Nationscape data reveals a notable departure from this pattern. In 2016, negative voting was relatively balanced, with similar levels of hostility directed at Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. However, by 2020, asymmetric negative voting had emerged. As an incumbent seeking re-election amid a rapidly declining economy, the COVID-19 pandemic, and widespread uncertainty, Trump faced heightened negative perceptions fueled by dissatisfaction with his handling of the economy, race relations, the pandemic, and his leadership style. These factors galvanized younger, educated Democrats and Independents to vote against him in unprecedented numbers. In contrast, Republicans expressed less animosity toward Biden in 2020 than they had toward Clinton in 2016. This shift disrupted the balance in the typical pattern of symmetric negative voting. |
| title | Breaking the Balance: Asymmetric Negative Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election |
| topic | Applications |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16081 |