Analysis and Improvement of Eviction Enforcement

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Ata, Baris, Zhou, Yuwei
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866929726769070080
author Ata, Baris
Zhou, Yuwei
author_facet Ata, Baris
Zhou, Yuwei
contents Each year, nearly 13,000 eviction orders are issued in Cook County, Illinois. While most of these orders have an enforcement deadline, a portion does not. The Cook County Sheriff's Office (CCSO) is responsible for enforcing these orders, which involves selecting the orders to prioritize and planning daily enforcement routes. This task presents a challenge: balancing "equity" (i.e., prioritizing orders that have been waiting longer) with "efficiency" (i.e., maximizing the number of orders served). Although the current CCSO policy is highly efficient, a significant fraction of eviction orders miss their deadline. Motivated by the CCSO's operations, we study a model of eviction enforcement planning and propose a policy that dynamically prioritizes orders based on their type (deadline or no deadline), location, and waiting time. Our approach employs a budgeted prize-collecting vehicle routing problem (VRP) for daily planning, where the "prizes" are determined by solving a stochastic control problem. This stochastic control problem, which relies on the VRP for determining feasible actions at each decision point, is high-dimensional due to its spatial nature, leading to the curse of dimensionality. We overcome this challenge by building on recent advances in high-dimensional stochastic control using deep neural networks. We compare the performance of our proposed policy with two practical benchmark policies, including one that mimics the current CCSO policy, using data from CCSO. Similar to the CCSO policy, our proposed policy leads to efficient resource utilization, but it also reduces the percentage of orders that miss their deadline by 72.38% without degrading the overall service effort for either type of orders. In a counterfactual study, we show that increasing the service capacity or extending the enforcement deadline further reduces the fraction of orders missing their deadline.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2502_16346
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Analysis and Improvement of Eviction Enforcement
Ata, Baris
Zhou, Yuwei
Optimization and Control
Each year, nearly 13,000 eviction orders are issued in Cook County, Illinois. While most of these orders have an enforcement deadline, a portion does not. The Cook County Sheriff's Office (CCSO) is responsible for enforcing these orders, which involves selecting the orders to prioritize and planning daily enforcement routes. This task presents a challenge: balancing "equity" (i.e., prioritizing orders that have been waiting longer) with "efficiency" (i.e., maximizing the number of orders served). Although the current CCSO policy is highly efficient, a significant fraction of eviction orders miss their deadline. Motivated by the CCSO's operations, we study a model of eviction enforcement planning and propose a policy that dynamically prioritizes orders based on their type (deadline or no deadline), location, and waiting time. Our approach employs a budgeted prize-collecting vehicle routing problem (VRP) for daily planning, where the "prizes" are determined by solving a stochastic control problem. This stochastic control problem, which relies on the VRP for determining feasible actions at each decision point, is high-dimensional due to its spatial nature, leading to the curse of dimensionality. We overcome this challenge by building on recent advances in high-dimensional stochastic control using deep neural networks. We compare the performance of our proposed policy with two practical benchmark policies, including one that mimics the current CCSO policy, using data from CCSO. Similar to the CCSO policy, our proposed policy leads to efficient resource utilization, but it also reduces the percentage of orders that miss their deadline by 72.38% without degrading the overall service effort for either type of orders. In a counterfactual study, we show that increasing the service capacity or extending the enforcement deadline further reduces the fraction of orders missing their deadline.
title Analysis and Improvement of Eviction Enforcement
topic Optimization and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16346